netaddress: Update CNetAddr for ORCHIDv2 #15689
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
utACK 8be3f30 |
|
Maybe we should instead just have a single IsUnroutable function that tests for all these cases simultaneously. Perhaps it just has a const vector of prefixes to check against. |
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ConflictsNo conflicts as of last run. |
ryanofsky
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2019
Here's a take on that: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/master...Empact:is-routable?expand=1 |
00a50a0 to
8be3f30
Compare
The original ORCHID prefix was deprecated as of 2014-03, the new ORCHIDv2 prefix was allocated by RFC7343 as of 2014-07. We did not consider the original ORCHID prefix routable, and I don't see any reason to consider the new one to be either.
|
Rebased, I think I'm going to limit this change to just ORCHIDv2 for now. |
|
utACK 8be3f30. Only change since last review is rebasing after #15718 merge. re: #15689 (comment)
I was initially confused by this comment because this PR was always limited to ORCHIDv2. But this is just a response to an earlier comment about potentially expanding the PR: #15689 (comment) |
Good idea but can be done separately. |
laanwj
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2019
8be3f30 netaddress: Update CNetAddr for ORCHIDv2 (Carl Dong) Pull request description: ``` The original ORCHID prefix was deprecated as of 2014-03, the new ORCHIDv2 prefix was allocated by RFC7343 as of 2014-07. We did not consider the original ORCHID prefix routable, and I don't see any reason to consider the new one to be either. ``` Would like to know if people think this kind of thing is even worth keeping the codebase updated for. Perhaps it'd be nice to write a devtool to pull the csv from [here](https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml) and generate the code. ACKs for commit 8be3f3: laanwj: utACK 8be3f30 ryanofsky: utACK 8be3f30. Only change since last review is rebasing after #15718 merge. Tree-SHA512: 7c93317f597b1a6c1443e12dd690010392edb9d72a479a8201970db7d3444fbb99a80b98026caad6fbfbebb455ab4035d2dde79bc9263bfd1d0398cd218392e1
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2019
8be3f30 netaddress: Update CNetAddr for ORCHIDv2 (Carl Dong) Pull request description: ``` The original ORCHID prefix was deprecated as of 2014-03, the new ORCHIDv2 prefix was allocated by RFC7343 as of 2014-07. We did not consider the original ORCHID prefix routable, and I don't see any reason to consider the new one to be either. ``` Would like to know if people think this kind of thing is even worth keeping the codebase updated for. Perhaps it'd be nice to write a devtool to pull the csv from [here](https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml) and generate the code. ACKs for commit 8be3f3: laanwj: utACK 8be3f30 ryanofsky: utACK 8be3f30. Only change since last review is rebasing after bitcoin#15718 merge. Tree-SHA512: 7c93317f597b1a6c1443e12dd690010392edb9d72a479a8201970db7d3444fbb99a80b98026caad6fbfbebb455ab4035d2dde79bc9263bfd1d0398cd218392e1
deadalnix
pushed a commit
to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2020
Summary: The original ORCHID prefix was deprecated as of 2014-03, the new ORCHIDv2 prefix was allocated by RFC7343 as of 2014-07. We did not consider the original ORCHID prefix routable, and I don't see any reason to consider the new one to be either. This is a backport of Core [[bitcoin/bitcoin#15689 | PR15689]] Test Plan: ninja all check-all Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta, Fabien Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta, Fabien Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D6210
ftrader
pushed a commit
to bitcoin-cash-node/bitcoin-cash-node
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2020
Summary: The original ORCHID prefix was deprecated as of 2014-03, the new ORCHIDv2 prefix was allocated by RFC7343 as of 2014-07. We did not consider the original ORCHID prefix routable, and I don't see any reason to consider the new one to be either. This is a backport of Core [[bitcoin/bitcoin#15689 | PR15689]] Test Plan: ninja all check-all Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta, Fabien Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta, Fabien Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D6210
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2021
8be3f30 netaddress: Update CNetAddr for ORCHIDv2 (Carl Dong) Pull request description: ``` The original ORCHID prefix was deprecated as of 2014-03, the new ORCHIDv2 prefix was allocated by RFC7343 as of 2014-07. We did not consider the original ORCHID prefix routable, and I don't see any reason to consider the new one to be either. ``` Would like to know if people think this kind of thing is even worth keeping the codebase updated for. Perhaps it'd be nice to write a devtool to pull the csv from [here](https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml) and generate the code. ACKs for commit 8be3f3: laanwj: utACK 8be3f30 ryanofsky: utACK 8be3f30. Only change since last review is rebasing after bitcoin#15718 merge. Tree-SHA512: 7c93317f597b1a6c1443e12dd690010392edb9d72a479a8201970db7d3444fbb99a80b98026caad6fbfbebb455ab4035d2dde79bc9263bfd1d0398cd218392e1
UdjinM6
pushed a commit
to UdjinM6/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2021
8be3f30 netaddress: Update CNetAddr for ORCHIDv2 (Carl Dong) Pull request description: ``` The original ORCHID prefix was deprecated as of 2014-03, the new ORCHIDv2 prefix was allocated by RFC7343 as of 2014-07. We did not consider the original ORCHID prefix routable, and I don't see any reason to consider the new one to be either. ``` Would like to know if people think this kind of thing is even worth keeping the codebase updated for. Perhaps it'd be nice to write a devtool to pull the csv from [here](https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml) and generate the code. ACKs for commit 8be3f3: laanwj: utACK 8be3f30 ryanofsky: utACK 8be3f30. Only change since last review is rebasing after bitcoin#15718 merge. Tree-SHA512: 7c93317f597b1a6c1443e12dd690010392edb9d72a479a8201970db7d3444fbb99a80b98026caad6fbfbebb455ab4035d2dde79bc9263bfd1d0398cd218392e1
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2021
8be3f30 netaddress: Update CNetAddr for ORCHIDv2 (Carl Dong) Pull request description: ``` The original ORCHID prefix was deprecated as of 2014-03, the new ORCHIDv2 prefix was allocated by RFC7343 as of 2014-07. We did not consider the original ORCHID prefix routable, and I don't see any reason to consider the new one to be either. ``` Would like to know if people think this kind of thing is even worth keeping the codebase updated for. Perhaps it'd be nice to write a devtool to pull the csv from [here](https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml) and generate the code. ACKs for commit 8be3f3: laanwj: utACK 8be3f30 ryanofsky: utACK 8be3f30. Only change since last review is rebasing after bitcoin#15718 merge. Tree-SHA512: 7c93317f597b1a6c1443e12dd690010392edb9d72a479a8201970db7d3444fbb99a80b98026caad6fbfbebb455ab4035d2dde79bc9263bfd1d0398cd218392e1
random-zebra
added a commit
to PIVX-Project/PIVX
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2021
ecde04a [Consensus] Bump Active Protocol version to 70923 for v5.3 (random-zebra) b63e4f5 Consensus: Add v5.3 enforcement height for testnet. (furszy) f44be94 Only relay IPv4, IPv6, Tor addresses (Pieter Wuille) 015298c fix: tor: Call event_base_loopbreak from the event's callback (furszy) 34ff7a8 Consensus: Add mnb ADDRv2 guard. (furszy) b4515dc GUI: Present v3 onion addresses properly in MNs list. (furszy) 337d43d tests: don't export in6addr_loopback (Vasil Dimov) 2cde8e0 GUI: Do not show the tor v3 onion address in the topbar. (furszy) 0b5f406 Doc: update tor.md with latest upstream information. (furszy) 89df7f2 addrman: ensure old versions don't parse peers.dat (Vasil Dimov) bb90c5c test: add getnetworkinfo network name regression tests (Jon Atack) d8e01b5 rpc: update GetNetworksInfo() to not return unsupported networks (Jon Atack) 57fc7b0 net: update GetNetworkName() with all enum Network cases (Jon Atack) 647d60b tests: Modify rpc_bind to conform to bitcoin#14532 behaviour. (Carl Dong) d4d6729 Allow running rpc_bind.py --nonloopback test without IPv6 (Kristaps Kaupe) 4a034d8 test: Add rpc_bind test to default-run tests (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 61a08af [tests] bind functional test nodes to 127.0.0.1 Prevents OSX firewall (Sjors Provoost) 6a4f1e0 test: Add basic addr relay test (furszy) 78aa61c net: Make addr relay mockable (furszy) ba954ca Send and require SENDADDRV2 before VERACK (Pieter Wuille) 61c2ed4 Bump net protocol version + don't send 'sendaddrv2' to pre-70923 software (furszy) ccd508a tor: make a TORv3 hidden service instead of TORv2 (Vasil Dimov) 6da9a14 net: advertise support for ADDRv2 via new message (furszy) e58d5d0 Migrate to test_large_inv() to Misbehaving logging. (furszy) d496b64 [QA] fix mininode CAddress ser/deser (Jonas Schnelli) cec9567 net: CAddress & CAddrMan: (un)serialize as ADDRv2 Change the serialization of `CAddrMan` to serialize its addresses in ADDRv2/BIP155 format by default. Introduce a new `CAddrMan` format version (3). (furszy) b8c1dda streams update: get rid of nType and nVersion. (furszy) 3eaa273 Support bypassing range check in ReadCompactSize (Pieter Wuille) a237ba4 net: recognize TORv3/I2P/CJDNS networks (Vasil Dimov) 8e50853 util: make EncodeBase32 consume Spans (Sebastian Falbesoner) 1f67e30 net: CNetAddr: add support to (un)serialize as ADDRv2 (Vasil Dimov) 2455420 test: move HasReason so it can be reused (furszy) d41adb4 util: move HasPrefix() so it can be reused (Vasil Dimov) f6f86af Unroll Keccak-f implementation (Pieter Wuille) 45222e6 Implement keccak-f[1600] and SHA3-256 (Pieter Wuille) 08ad06d net: change CNetAddr::ip to have flexible size (furszy) 3337219 net: improve encapsulation of CNetAddr. (furszy) 910d5c4 test: Do not instantiate CAddrDB for static call (Hennadii Stepanov) 6b607ef Drop IsLimited in favor of IsReachable (Ben Woosley) a40711b IsReachable is the inverse of IsLimited (DRY). Includes unit tests (marcaiaf) 8839828 net: don't accept non-left-contiguous netmasks (Vasil Dimov) 5d7f864 rpcbind: Warn about exposing RPC to untrusted networks (Luke Dashjr) 2a6abd8 CNetAddr: Add IsBindAny method to check for INADDR_ANY (Luke Dashjr) 4fdfa45 net: Always default rpcbind to localhost, never "all interfaces" (Luke Dashjr) 31064a8 net: Minor accumulated cleanups (furszy) 9f9c871 tests: Avoid using C-style NUL-terminated strings as arguments (practicalswift) f6c52a3 tests: Add tests to make sure lookup methods fail on std::string parameters with embedded NUL characters (practicalswift) a751b9b net: Avoid using C-style NUL-terminated strings as arguments in the netbase interface (furszy) f30869d test: add IsRFC2544 tests (Mark Tyneway) ed5abe1 Net: Proper CService deserialization + GetIn6Addr return false if addr isn't an IPv6 addr (furszy) 86d73fb net: save the network type explicitly in CNetAddr (Vasil Dimov) ad57dfc net: document `enum Network` (Vasil Dimov) cb160de netaddress: Update CNetAddr for ORCHIDv2 (Carl Dong) c3c04e4 net: Better misbehaving logging (furszy) 3660487 net: Use C++11 member initialization in protocol (Marco) 082baa3 refactor: Drop unused CBufferedFile::Seek() (Hennadii Stepanov) e2d776a util: CBufferedFile fixes (Larry Ruane) 6921f42 streams: backport OverrideStream class (furszy) Pull request description: Conjunction of a large number of back ports, updates and refactorings that made with the final goal of implementing v3 Onion addresses support (BIP155 https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0155.mediawiki) before the tor v2 addresses EOL, scheduled, by the Tor project, for (1) July 15th: v2 addr support removal from the code base, and (2) October 15th: v2 addr network disable, where **every peer in our network running under Tor will loose the connection and drop the network**. As BIP155 describes, this is introducing a new P2P message to gossip longer node addresses over the P2P network. This is required to support new-generation Onion addresses, I2P, and potentially other networks that have longer endpoint addresses than fit in the 128 bits of the current addr message. In order to achieve the end goal, had to: 1. Create Span class and push it up to latest Bitcoin implementation. 2. Update the whole serialization framework and every object using it up to latest Bitcoin implementation (3-4 years ahead of what we currently are in master). 3. Update the address manager implementing ASN-based bucketing of the network nodes. 4. Update and refactor the netAddress and address manager tests to latest Bitcoin implementation (4 years ahead of what we currently are in master). 5. Several util string, vector, encodings, parsing, hashing backports and more.. Important note: This PR it is not meant to be merged as a standalone PR, will decouple smaller ones moving on. Adding on each sub-PR its own description isolated from this big monster. Second note: This is still a **work-in-progress**, not ready for testing yet. I'm probably missing to mention few PRs that have already adapted to our sources. Just making it public so can decouple the changes, we can start merging them and i can continue working a bit more confortable (rebase a +170 commits separate branch is not fun..). ### List of back ported and adapted PRs: Span and Serialization: ---------------- * bitcoin#12886. * bitcoin#12916. * bitcoin#13558. * bitcoin#13697. (Only Span's commit 29943a9) * bitcoin#17850. * bitcoin#17896. * bitcoin#12752. * bitcoin#16577. * bitcoin#16670. (without faebf62) * bitcoin#17957. * bitcoin#18021. * bitcoin#18087. * bitcoin#18112 (only from 353f376 that we don't support). * bitcoin#18167. * bitcoin#18317. * bitcoin#18591 (only Span's commit 0fbde48) * bitcoin#18468. * bitcoin#19020. * bitcoin#19032. * bitcoin#19367. * bitcoin#19387. Net, NetAddress and AddrMan: ---------------- * bitcoin#7932. * bitcoin#10756. * bitcoin#10765. * bitcoin#12218. * bitcoin#12855. * bitcoin#13532. * bitcoin#13575. * bitcoin#13815. * bitcoin#14532. * bitcoin#15051. * bitcoin#15138. * bitcoin#15689. * bitcoin#16702. * bitcoin#17243. * bitcoin#17345. * bitcoin#17754. * bitcoin#17758. * bitcoin#17812. * bitcoin#18023. * bitcoin#18454. * bitcoin#18512. * bitcoin#19314. * bitcoin#19687 Keys and Addresses encoding: ---------------- * bitcoin#11372. * bitcoin#17511. * bitcoin#17721. Util: ---------------- * bitcoin#9140. * bitcoin#16577. * bitcoin#16889. * bitcoin#19593. Bench: ---------------- * bitcoin#16299. BIP155: ---------------- * bitcoin#19351. * bitcoin#19360. * bitcoin#19534. * bitcoin#19628. * bitcoin#19841. * bitcoin#19845. * bitcoin#19954. * bitcoin#19991 (pending). * bitcoin#19845. * bitcoin#20000 (pending). * bitcoin#20120. * bitcoin#20284. * bitcoin#20564. * bitcoin#21157 (pending). * bitcoin#21564 (pending). * Fully removed v2 onion addr support. * Add hardcoded seeds. * Add release-notes, changes to files.md and every needed documentation. I'm currently working on the PRs marked as "pending", this isn't over, but I'm pretty pretty close :). What a long road.. ACKs for top commit: random-zebra: utACK ecde04a Fuzzbawls: ACK ecde04a Tree-SHA512: 82c95fbda76fce63f96d8a9af7fa9a89cb1e1b302b7891e27118a6103af0be23606bf202c7332fa61908205e6b6351764e2ec23d753f1e2484028f57c2e8b51a
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Would like to know if people think this kind of thing is even worth keeping the codebase updated for. Perhaps it'd be nice to write a devtool to pull the csv from here and generate the code.