Skip to content

Conversation

carlopi
Copy link
Contributor

@carlopi carlopi commented Nov 28, 2023

Simplify duckdb-wasm CMake pipeline.

This was part of #9800, but it makes sense to split in two parts, one of which dependent on #9821

@carlopi
Copy link
Contributor Author

carlopi commented Dec 1, 2023

Code is not changing anything for non-wasm compilation, so I don't see how the failures can be related.

@Mytherin Mytherin merged commit 69ddf78 into duckdb:main Dec 1, 2023
@Mytherin
Copy link
Collaborator

Mytherin commented Dec 1, 2023

Thanks! Please don't label your own PRs with Ready To Merge though, that's for the reviewers to do :)

krlmlr added a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2023
Merge pull request duckdb/duckdb#9868 from Mytherin/tsanfix
Merge pull request duckdb/duckdb#9846 from samansmink/fix-s3fs-close-issue
Merge pull request duckdb/duckdb#9830 from carlopi/reworkcmakewasm
Merge pull request duckdb/duckdb#9848 from Tishj/python_remove_infinity_scan
Merge pull request duckdb/duckdb#9860 from chrisiou/fix-empty-box
@carlopi carlopi deleted the reworkcmakewasm branch January 10, 2024 10:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants