-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37.7k
fuzz: Improve fuzzing stability for ellswift_roundtrip harness #29219
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fuzz: Improve fuzzing stability for ellswift_roundtrip harness #29219
Conversation
`CPubKey::VerifyPubKey` uses rng internally which leads to instability in the fuzz test. We fix this by avoiding `VerifyPubKey` in the test and verifying the decoded public key with a fuzzer chosen message instead.
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. Code CoverageFor detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report. ReviewsSee the guideline for information on the review process.
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update. |
utACK 154fcce |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
crACK 154fcce
…ndtrip harness 154fcce [fuzz] Improve fuzzing stability for ellswift_roundtrip harness (dergoegge) Pull request description: See bitcoin#29018 ACKs for top commit: sipa: utACK 154fcce brunoerg: crACK 154fcce Tree-SHA512: 1e1ee47467a4a0d3a4e79f672018b440d8b3ccafba7428d37b9d0b8d3afd07e3f64f53ee668ed8a6a9ad1919422b5970814eaf857890acae7546951d8cb141d6
…ndtrip harness 154fcce [fuzz] Improve fuzzing stability for ellswift_roundtrip harness (dergoegge) Pull request description: See bitcoin#29018 ACKs for top commit: sipa: utACK 154fcce brunoerg: crACK 154fcce Tree-SHA512: 1e1ee47467a4a0d3a4e79f672018b440d8b3ccafba7428d37b9d0b8d3afd07e3f64f53ee668ed8a6a9ad1919422b5970814eaf857890acae7546951d8cb141d6
…ndtrip harness 154fcce [fuzz] Improve fuzzing stability for ellswift_roundtrip harness (dergoegge) Pull request description: See bitcoin#29018 ACKs for top commit: sipa: utACK 154fcce brunoerg: crACK 154fcce Tree-SHA512: 1e1ee47467a4a0d3a4e79f672018b440d8b3ccafba7428d37b9d0b8d3afd07e3f64f53ee668ed8a6a9ad1919422b5970814eaf857890acae7546951d8cb141d6
8bf1d06 Merge bitcoin#29308: doc: update `BroadcastTransaction` comment (glozow) 2a77808 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#789: Avoid non-self-contained Windows header (Hennadii Stepanov) da371b8 Merge bitcoin#28870: depends: Include `config.guess` and `config.sub` into `meta_depends` (fanquake) 2e41562 Merge bitcoin#29219: fuzz: Improve fuzzing stability for ellswift_roundtrip harness (fanquake) b091329 Merge bitcoin#29211: fuzz: fix `connman` initialization (Ava Chow) df42d41 Merge bitcoin#29200: net: create I2P sessions using both ECIES-X25519 and ElGamal encryption (fanquake) 4cdd1a8 Merge bitcoin#29172: fuzz: set `nMaxOutboundLimit` in connman target (fanquake) 97012ea Merge bitcoin#28962: doc: Rework guix docs after 1.4 release (fanquake) c70ff5d Merge bitcoin#28844: contrib: drop GCC MAX_VERSION to 4.3.0 in symbol-check (fanquake) e6f19e7 Merge bitcoin#29068: test: Actually fail when a python unit test fails (fanquake) 75e0334 Merge bitcoin#28989: test: Fix test by checking the actual exception instance (Andrew Chow) 8cd85d3 Merge bitcoin#28852: script, assumeutxo: Enhance validations in utxo_snapshot.sh (Ryan Ofsky) fd2e88d Merge bitcoin#26077: guix: switch from `guix environment` to `guix shell` (fanquake) 02741a7 Merge bitcoin#28913: coins: make sure PoolAllocator uses the correct alignment (fanquake) dfd53da Merge bitcoin#28902: doc: Simplify guix install doc, after 1.4 release (fanquake) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented Batch of trivial backports ## What was done? See commits ## How Has This Been Tested? built locally; large combined merge passed tests locally ## Breaking Changes Should be none ## Checklist: _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._ - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_ ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: utACK 8bf1d06 knst: utACK 8bf1d06 Tree-SHA512: 506273e5a188f9ca74edf656e3cd338992192e6e97f68c89fc43e34be20fb7f211b48e4dfa8693727839a7920da8284509413c722f55774a428939c296dad517
See #29018