Skip to content

Conversation

redwrasse
Copy link

Change comment from The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time is odd, to The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level is odd (to be a bit more precise: replacing time with level)

Change comment from `The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time
is odd`, to ` The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level
       is odd` (to be a bit more precise)
@sipa
Copy link
Member

sipa commented Mar 18, 2020

ACK

@maflcko maflcko changed the title Comment fix merkle.cpp doc: Comment fix merkle.cpp Mar 18, 2020
@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Mar 18, 2020

ACK 5b59a19

@instagibbs
Copy link
Member

ACK 5b59a19

@maflcko maflcko merged commit dbb067d into bitcoin:master Mar 18, 2020
@fanquake fanquake added the Docs label Mar 18, 2020
@redwrasse redwrasse deleted the 4d55397500-patch-1-1 branch March 18, 2020 19:31
@redwrasse redwrasse restored the 4d55397500-patch-1-1 branch March 18, 2020 23:43
@redwrasse redwrasse deleted the 4d55397500-patch-1-1 branch March 18, 2020 23:44
@redwrasse redwrasse restored the 4d55397500-patch-1-1 branch March 18, 2020 23:44
MarkLTZ added a commit to litecoinz-core/litecoinz that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2020
- doc: fix git add argument bitcoin#18513
- build: Fix libevent linking for bench_bitcoin binary bitcoin#18397
- script: fix SCRIPT_ERR_SIG_PUSHONLY error string bitcoin#18412
- doc: Comment fix merkle.cpp bitcoin#18379
- log: Fix UB with bench on genesis block bitcoin#15283
- test: Fix mining to an invalid target + ensure that a new block has the correct hash internally bitcoin#18350
- Fix missing header in sync.h bitcoin#18357
- refactor: Fix implicit value conversion in formatPingTime bitcoin#18260
- Fix .gitignore policy in build_msvc directory bitcoin#18108
- build: Fix behavior when ALLOW_HOST_PACKAGES unset bitcoin#18051
- test: Fix p2p_invalid_messages failing in Python 3.8 because of warning bitcoin#17931
- qa: Fix double-negative arg test bitcoin#17893
- build: Fix configure report about qr bitcoin#17547
- log: Fix log message for -par=1 bitcoin#17325
- bench: Fix negative values and zero for -evals flag bitcoin#17267
- depends: fix boost mac cross build with clang 9+ bitcoin#17231
- doc: Fix broken bitcoin-cli examples bitcoin#17119
- doc: fix Makefile target in benchmarking.md bitcoin#17081
- contrib: fix minor typos in makeseeds.py bitcoin#17042
- test: Fix Python Docstring to include all Args. bitcoin#17030
- doc: Fix some misspellings bitcoin#17351
- doc: Doxygen-friendly script/descriptor.h comments bitcoin#16947
- doc: Fix doxygen errors bitcoin#17945
- doc: Doxygen-friendly CuckooCache comments bitcoin#16986
- doc: Add to Doxygen documentation guidelines bitcoin#17873
MarkLTZ added a commit to litecoinz-core/litecoinz that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2020
- doc: fix git add argument bitcoin#18513
- build: Fix libevent linking for bench_bitcoin binary bitcoin#18397
- script: fix SCRIPT_ERR_SIG_PUSHONLY error string bitcoin#18412
- doc: Comment fix merkle.cpp bitcoin#18379
- log: Fix UB with bench on genesis block bitcoin#15283
- test: Fix mining to an invalid target + ensure that a new block has the correct hash internally bitcoin#18350
- Fix missing header in sync.h bitcoin#18357
- refactor: Fix implicit value conversion in formatPingTime bitcoin#18260
- Fix .gitignore policy in build_msvc directory bitcoin#18108
- build: Fix behavior when ALLOW_HOST_PACKAGES unset bitcoin#18051
- test: Fix p2p_invalid_messages failing in Python 3.8 because of warning bitcoin#17931
- qa: Fix double-negative arg test bitcoin#17893
- build: Fix configure report about qr bitcoin#17547
- log: Fix log message for -par=1 bitcoin#17325
- bench: Fix negative values and zero for -evals flag bitcoin#17267
- depends: fix boost mac cross build with clang 9+ bitcoin#17231
- doc: Fix broken bitcoin-cli examples bitcoin#17119
- doc: fix Makefile target in benchmarking.md bitcoin#17081
- contrib: fix minor typos in makeseeds.py bitcoin#17042
- test: Fix Python Docstring to include all Args. bitcoin#17030
- doc: Fix some misspellings bitcoin#17351
- doc: Doxygen-friendly script/descriptor.h comments bitcoin#16947
- doc: Fix doxygen errors bitcoin#17945
- doc: Doxygen-friendly CuckooCache comments bitcoin#16986
- doc: Add to Doxygen documentation guidelines bitcoin#17873
- depends: Consistent use of package variable bitcoin#17928
- init: Replace URL_WEBSITE with PACKAGE_URL bitcoin#18503
- doc: Add missed copyright headers bitcoin#17691
Fabcien pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2021
Summary:
> Change comment from `The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time is odd`, to ` The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level is odd` (to be a bit more precise)

This is a backport of Core [[bitcoin/bitcoin#18379 | PR18379]]

Test Plan: `ninja`

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D8858
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2021
5b59a19 Update merkle.cpp (4d55397500)

Pull request description:

  Change comment from `The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time
  is odd`, to ` The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level
         is odd` (to be a bit more precise: replacing `time` with `level`)

  <!--
  *** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***

  Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
  immediately.
  -->

  <!--
  Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
  Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
  significantly:

  * Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
  * All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
    functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
    modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
    should accompany the change.
  * Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
    explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
    was fixed.
  * Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
    If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
    consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
  * Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
    bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
    most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
    are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
    developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
    is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
    preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
    changes are usually rejected.
  -->

  <!--
  Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
  needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
  effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
  patches often sit for a long time.
  -->

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 5b59a19
  instagibbs:
    ACK bitcoin@5b59a19

Tree-SHA512: 30d29b9855b30de8b54033ca4884cfb5bf8ab9e52cf61da237abba0e15ebff947c65f8ba82175694bc60ee0d54f940a098cadcb0404d3c3bcf577006ab0561a5
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2021
5b59a19 Update merkle.cpp (4d55397500)

Pull request description:

  Change comment from `The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time
  is odd`, to ` The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level
         is odd` (to be a bit more precise: replacing `time` with `level`)

  <!--
  *** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***

  Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
  immediately.
  -->

  <!--
  Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
  Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
  significantly:

  * Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
  * All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
    functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
    modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
    should accompany the change.
  * Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
    explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
    was fixed.
  * Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
    If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
    consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
  * Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
    bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
    most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
    are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
    developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
    is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
    preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
    changes are usually rejected.
  -->

  <!--
  Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
  needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
  effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
  patches often sit for a long time.
  -->

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 5b59a19
  instagibbs:
    ACK bitcoin@5b59a19

Tree-SHA512: 30d29b9855b30de8b54033ca4884cfb5bf8ab9e52cf61da237abba0e15ebff947c65f8ba82175694bc60ee0d54f940a098cadcb0404d3c3bcf577006ab0561a5
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2021
5b59a19 Update merkle.cpp (4d55397500)

Pull request description:

  Change comment from `The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time
  is odd`, to ` The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level
         is odd` (to be a bit more precise: replacing `time` with `level`)

  <!--
  *** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***

  Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
  immediately.
  -->

  <!--
  Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
  Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
  significantly:

  * Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
  * All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
    functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
    modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
    should accompany the change.
  * Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
    explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
    was fixed.
  * Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
    If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
    consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
  * Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
    bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
    most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
    are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
    developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
    is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
    preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
    changes are usually rejected.
  -->

  <!--
  Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
  needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
  effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
  patches often sit for a long time.
  -->

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 5b59a19
  instagibbs:
    ACK bitcoin@5b59a19

Tree-SHA512: 30d29b9855b30de8b54033ca4884cfb5bf8ab9e52cf61da237abba0e15ebff947c65f8ba82175694bc60ee0d54f940a098cadcb0404d3c3bcf577006ab0561a5
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2021
5b59a19 Update merkle.cpp (4d55397500)

Pull request description:

  Change comment from `The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time
  is odd`, to ` The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level
         is odd` (to be a bit more precise: replacing `time` with `level`)

  <!--
  *** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***

  Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
  immediately.
  -->

  <!--
  Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
  Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
  significantly:

  * Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
  * All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
    functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
    modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
    should accompany the change.
  * Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
    explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
    was fixed.
  * Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
    If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
    consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
  * Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
    bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
    most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
    are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
    developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
    is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
    preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
    changes are usually rejected.
  -->

  <!--
  Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
  needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
  effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
  patches often sit for a long time.
  -->

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 5b59a19
  instagibbs:
    ACK bitcoin@5b59a19

Tree-SHA512: 30d29b9855b30de8b54033ca4884cfb5bf8ab9e52cf61da237abba0e15ebff947c65f8ba82175694bc60ee0d54f940a098cadcb0404d3c3bcf577006ab0561a5
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2021
5b59a19 Update merkle.cpp (4d55397500)

Pull request description:

  Change comment from `The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time
  is odd`, to ` The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level
         is odd` (to be a bit more precise: replacing `time` with `level`)

  <!--
  *** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***

  Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
  immediately.
  -->

  <!--
  Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
  Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
  significantly:

  * Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
  * All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
    functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
    modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
    should accompany the change.
  * Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
    explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
    was fixed.
  * Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
    If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
    consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
  * Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
    bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
    most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
    are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
    developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
    is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
    preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
    changes are usually rejected.
  -->

  <!--
  Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
  needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
  effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
  patches often sit for a long time.
  -->

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 5b59a19
  instagibbs:
    ACK bitcoin@5b59a19

Tree-SHA512: 30d29b9855b30de8b54033ca4884cfb5bf8ab9e52cf61da237abba0e15ebff947c65f8ba82175694bc60ee0d54f940a098cadcb0404d3c3bcf577006ab0561a5
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2021
5b59a19 Update merkle.cpp (4d55397500)

Pull request description:

  Change comment from `The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time
  is odd`, to ` The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level
         is odd` (to be a bit more precise: replacing `time` with `level`)

  <!--
  *** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***

  Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
  immediately.
  -->

  <!--
  Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
  Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
  significantly:

  * Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
  * All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
    functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
    modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
    should accompany the change.
  * Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
    explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
    was fixed.
  * Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
    If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
    consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
  * Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
    bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
    most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
    are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
    developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
    is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
    preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
    changes are usually rejected.
  -->

  <!--
  Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
  needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
  effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
  patches often sit for a long time.
  -->

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 5b59a19
  instagibbs:
    ACK bitcoin@5b59a19

Tree-SHA512: 30d29b9855b30de8b54033ca4884cfb5bf8ab9e52cf61da237abba0e15ebff947c65f8ba82175694bc60ee0d54f940a098cadcb0404d3c3bcf577006ab0561a5
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2021
5b59a19 Update merkle.cpp (4d55397500)

Pull request description:

  Change comment from `The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time
  is odd`, to ` The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level
         is odd` (to be a bit more precise: replacing `time` with `level`)

  <!--
  *** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***

  Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
  immediately.
  -->

  <!--
  Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
  Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
  significantly:

  * Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
  * All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
    functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
    modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
    should accompany the change.
  * Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
    explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
    was fixed.
  * Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
    If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
    consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
  * Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
    bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
    most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
    are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
    developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
    is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
    preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
    changes are usually rejected.
  -->

  <!--
  Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
  needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
  effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
  patches often sit for a long time.
  -->

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 5b59a19
  instagibbs:
    ACK bitcoin@5b59a19

Tree-SHA512: 30d29b9855b30de8b54033ca4884cfb5bf8ab9e52cf61da237abba0e15ebff947c65f8ba82175694bc60ee0d54f940a098cadcb0404d3c3bcf577006ab0561a5
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 15, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants