Skip to content

Conversation

fireshots
Copy link

This adds support for the AsahiKASEI magnetometer sensor compatible string.

@PotHix
Copy link

PotHix commented Oct 27, 2015

Please look at #192 :)

laijs pushed a commit to laijs/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2017
lkl: Fix lkl_add_neighbor close
wzyy2 pushed a commit to wzyy2/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2017
If iommu_map_sg is error, it's return value is zero, but
rockchip_gem_iommu_map feel the zero return value is success,
bug happen:

[    5.227458] [drm:rockchip_gem_iommu_map] *ERROR* failed to map buffer: 0
[   12.291590] WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c:369
[   12.291611] Modules linked in:
[   12.291634]
[   12.291658] CPU: 4 PID: 338 Comm: cameraserver Not tainted 4.4.41 torvalds#196
[   12.291680] Hardware name: rockchip,rk3399-mid (DT)
[   12.291703] task: ffffffc0e5a23100 ti: ffffffc0e5a64000 task.ti: ffffffc0e5a64000
[   12.291739] PC is at drm_mm_remove_node+0xc/0xf8
[   12.291766] LR is at rockchip_gem_iommu_unmap+0x3c/0x54
[   12.303799] [<ffffff80084526e0>] drm_mm_remove_node+0xc/0xf8
[   12.303827] [<ffffff8008475430>] rockchip_gem_free_object+0x98/0x168
[   12.303854] [<ffffff8008449e80>] drm_gem_object_free+0x2c/0x34
[   12.303878] [<ffffff80084626c4>] drm_gem_dmabuf_release+0x90/0xa4
[   12.303904] [<ffffff80084ee73c>] dma_buf_release+0x64/0x15c
[   12.303929] [<ffffff80081aa8dc>] __fput+0xe0/0x1a4
[   12.303950] [<ffffff80081aa9f8>] ____fput+0xc/0x14
[   12.303977] [<ffffff80080b65ec>] task_work_run+0xa0/0xc0
[   12.304004] [<ffffff8008087f18>] do_notify_resume+0x40/0x54
[   12.304026] [<ffffff80080825e4>] work_pending+0x10/0x14

Change-Id: Id79c052691270553c1c60086f9926f39a5296354
Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2020
…adlock

After base_lock which occupy by ath11k_regd_update, the softirq run for
WMI_REG_CHAN_LIST_CC_EVENTID maybe arrived and it also need to accuire
the spin lock, then deadlock happend, change to disable softirqis to solve it.

[  235.576990] ================================
[  235.576991] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[  235.576993] 5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ torvalds#196 Not tainted
[  235.576994] --------------------------------
[  235.576995] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[  235.576997] kworker/u16:1/98 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[  235.576998] ffff9655f75cad98 (&ab->base_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577009] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[  235.577013]   __lock_acquire+0x219/0x6e0
[  235.577015]   lock_acquire+0xb6/0x270
[  235.577018]   _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x70
[  235.577023]   ath11k_reg_chan_list_event.isra.0+0x10d/0x1e0 [ath11k]
[  235.577028]   ath11k_wmi_tlv_op_rx+0x3c3/0x560 [ath11k]
[  235.577033]   ath11k_htc_rx_completion_handler+0x207/0x370 [ath11k]
[  235.577039]   ath11k_ce_recv_process_cb+0x15e/0x1e0 [ath11k]
[  235.577041]   ath11k_pci_ce_tasklet+0x10/0x30 [ath11k_pci]
[  235.577043]   tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xd4/0xf0
[  235.577045]   __do_softirq+0xc9/0x482
[  235.577046]   asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20
[  235.577048]   do_softirq_own_stack+0x49/0x60
[  235.577049]   irq_exit_rcu+0x9a/0xd0
[  235.577050]   common_interrupt+0xa1/0x190
[  235.577052]   asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
[  235.577053]   cpu_idle_poll.isra.0+0x2e/0x60
[  235.577055]   do_idle+0x5f/0xe0
[  235.577056]   cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
[  235.577058]   start_kernel+0x443/0x464
[  235.577060]   secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[  235.577061] irq event stamp: 432035
[  235.577063] hardirqs last  enabled at (432035): [<ffffffff968d12b4>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x40
[  235.577064] hardirqs last disabled at (432034): [<ffffffff968d10d3>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x63/0x80
[  235.577066] softirqs last  enabled at (431998): [<ffffffff967115c1>] inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs+0x3f1/0x430
[  235.577067] softirqs last disabled at (431996): [<ffffffff9671159f>] inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs+0x3cf/0x430
[  235.577068]
[  235.577068] other info that might help us debug this:
[  235.577069]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  235.577069]
[  235.577070]        CPU0
[  235.577070]        ----
[  235.577071]   lock(&ab->base_lock);
[  235.577072]   <Interrupt>
[  235.577073]     lock(&ab->base_lock);
[  235.577074]
[  235.577074]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  235.577074]
[  235.577075] 3 locks held by kworker/u16:1/98:
[  235.577076]  #0: ffff9655f75b1d48 ((wq_completion)ath11k_qmi_driver_event){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d3/0x5d0
[  235.577079]  #1: ffffa33cc02f3e70 ((work_completion)(&ab->qmi.event_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d3/0x5d0
[  235.577081]  #2: ffff9655f75cad50 (&ab->core_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready.part.0+0x4e/0x160 [ath11k]
[  235.577087]
[  235.577087] stack backtrace:
[  235.577088] CPU: 3 PID: 98 Comm: kworker/u16:1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ torvalds#196
[  235.577089] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC8i7HVK/NUC8i7HVB, BIOS HNKBLi70.86A.0049.2018.0801.1601 08/01/2018
[  235.577095] Workqueue: ath11k_qmi_driver_event ath11k_qmi_driver_event_work [ath11k]
[  235.577096] Call Trace:
[  235.577100]  dump_stack+0x77/0xa0
[  235.577102]  mark_lock_irq.cold+0x15/0x3c
[  235.577104]  mark_lock+0x1d7/0x540
[  235.577105]  mark_usage+0xc7/0x140
[  235.577107]  __lock_acquire+0x219/0x6e0
[  235.577108]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xb0
[  235.577110]  lock_acquire+0xb6/0x270
[  235.577116]  ? ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577118]  ? atomic_notifier_chain_register+0x2d/0x40
[  235.577120]  _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x70
[  235.577125]  ? ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577130]  ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577136]  __ath11k_mac_register+0x3fb/0x480 [ath11k]
[  235.577141]  ath11k_mac_register+0x119/0x180 [ath11k]
[  235.577146]  ath11k_core_pdev_create+0x17/0xe0 [ath11k]
[  235.577150]  ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready.part.0+0x65/0x160 [ath11k]
[  235.577155]  ath11k_qmi_driver_event_work+0x1c5/0x230 [ath11k]
[  235.577158]  process_one_work+0x265/0x5d0
[  235.577160]  worker_thread+0x49/0x300
[  235.577161]  ? process_one_work+0x5d0/0x5d0
[  235.577163]  kthread+0x135/0x150
[  235.577164]  ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x60/0x60
[  235.577166]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1

Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2020
…u_desc

With SLUB DEBUG CONFIG below crash is seen as kmem_cache_alloc
is being called in non-atomic context.

To fix this issue, use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL kzalloc.

[  357.217088] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:498
[  357.217091] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/0
[  357.217092] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[  357.217095] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W         5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ torvalds#196
[  357.217096] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC8i7HVK/NUC8i7HVB, BIOS HNKBLi70.86A.0049.2018.0801.1601 08/01/2018
[  357.217097] Call Trace:
[  357.217098]  <IRQ>
[  357.217107]  ? ath11k_dp_htt_get_ppdu_desc+0xa9/0x170 [ath11k]
[  357.217110]  dump_stack+0x77/0xa0
[  357.217113]  ___might_sleep.cold+0xa6/0xb6
[  357.217116]  kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1f2/0x270
[  357.217122]  ath11k_dp_htt_get_ppdu_desc+0xa9/0x170 [ath11k]
[  357.217129]  ath11k_htt_pull_ppdu_stats.isra.0+0x96/0x270 [ath11k]
[  357.217135]  ath11k_dp_htt_htc_t2h_msg_handler+0xe7/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  357.217137]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0x100
[  357.217143]  ath11k_htc_rx_completion_handler+0x207/0x370 [ath11k]
[  357.217149]  ath11k_ce_recv_process_cb+0x15e/0x1e0 [ath11k]
[  357.217151]  ? handle_irq_event+0x70/0xa8
[  357.217154]  ath11k_pci_ce_tasklet+0x10/0x30 [ath11k_pci]
[  357.217157]  tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xd4/0xf0
[  357.217160]  __do_softirq+0xc9/0x482
[  357.217162]  asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20
[  357.217163]  </IRQ>
[  357.217166]  do_softirq_own_stack+0x49/0x60
[  357.217167]  irq_exit_rcu+0x9a/0xd0
[  357.217169]  common_interrupt+0xa1/0x190
[  357.217171]  asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
[  357.217173] RIP: 0010:cpu_idle_poll.isra.0+0x2e/0x60
[  357.217175] Code: 8b 35 26 27 74 69 e8 11 c8 3d ff e8 bc fa 42 ff e8 e7 9f 4a ff fb 65 48 8b 1c 25 80 90 01 00 48 8b 03 a8 08 74 0b eb 1c f3 90 <48> 8b 03 a8 08 75 13 8b 0
[  357.217177] RSP: 0018:ffffffff97403ee0 EFLAGS: 00000202
[  357.217178] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffffffff9742b8c0 RCX: 0000000000b890ca
[  357.217180] RDX: 0000000000b890ca RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff968d0c49
[  357.217181] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
[  357.217182] R10: ffffffff9742b8c0 R11: 0000000000000046 R12: 0000000000000000
[  357.217183] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000066fdf520
[  357.217186]  ? cpu_idle_poll.isra.0+0x19/0x60
[  357.217189]  do_idle+0x5f/0xe0
[  357.217191]  cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
[  357.217193]  start_kernel+0x443/0x464
[  357.217196]  secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0

Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1

Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2020
…adlock

After base_lock which occupy by ath11k_regd_update, the softirq run for
WMI_REG_CHAN_LIST_CC_EVENTID maybe arrived and it also need to accuire
the spin lock, then deadlock happend, change to disable softirqis to solve it.

[  235.576990] ================================
[  235.576991] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[  235.576993] 5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ torvalds#196 Not tainted
[  235.576994] --------------------------------
[  235.576995] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[  235.576997] kworker/u16:1/98 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[  235.576998] ffff9655f75cad98 (&ab->base_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577009] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[  235.577013]   __lock_acquire+0x219/0x6e0
[  235.577015]   lock_acquire+0xb6/0x270
[  235.577018]   _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x70
[  235.577023]   ath11k_reg_chan_list_event.isra.0+0x10d/0x1e0 [ath11k]
[  235.577028]   ath11k_wmi_tlv_op_rx+0x3c3/0x560 [ath11k]
[  235.577033]   ath11k_htc_rx_completion_handler+0x207/0x370 [ath11k]
[  235.577039]   ath11k_ce_recv_process_cb+0x15e/0x1e0 [ath11k]
[  235.577041]   ath11k_pci_ce_tasklet+0x10/0x30 [ath11k_pci]
[  235.577043]   tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xd4/0xf0
[  235.577045]   __do_softirq+0xc9/0x482
[  235.577046]   asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20
[  235.577048]   do_softirq_own_stack+0x49/0x60
[  235.577049]   irq_exit_rcu+0x9a/0xd0
[  235.577050]   common_interrupt+0xa1/0x190
[  235.577052]   asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
[  235.577053]   cpu_idle_poll.isra.0+0x2e/0x60
[  235.577055]   do_idle+0x5f/0xe0
[  235.577056]   cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
[  235.577058]   start_kernel+0x443/0x464
[  235.577060]   secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[  235.577061] irq event stamp: 432035
[  235.577063] hardirqs last  enabled at (432035): [<ffffffff968d12b4>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x40
[  235.577064] hardirqs last disabled at (432034): [<ffffffff968d10d3>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x63/0x80
[  235.577066] softirqs last  enabled at (431998): [<ffffffff967115c1>] inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs+0x3f1/0x430
[  235.577067] softirqs last disabled at (431996): [<ffffffff9671159f>] inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs+0x3cf/0x430
[  235.577068]
[  235.577068] other info that might help us debug this:
[  235.577069]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  235.577069]
[  235.577070]        CPU0
[  235.577070]        ----
[  235.577071]   lock(&ab->base_lock);
[  235.577072]   <Interrupt>
[  235.577073]     lock(&ab->base_lock);
[  235.577074]
[  235.577074]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  235.577074]
[  235.577075] 3 locks held by kworker/u16:1/98:
[  235.577076]  #0: ffff9655f75b1d48 ((wq_completion)ath11k_qmi_driver_event){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d3/0x5d0
[  235.577079]  #1: ffffa33cc02f3e70 ((work_completion)(&ab->qmi.event_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d3/0x5d0
[  235.577081]  #2: ffff9655f75cad50 (&ab->core_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready.part.0+0x4e/0x160 [ath11k]
[  235.577087]
[  235.577087] stack backtrace:
[  235.577088] CPU: 3 PID: 98 Comm: kworker/u16:1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ torvalds#196
[  235.577089] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC8i7HVK/NUC8i7HVB, BIOS HNKBLi70.86A.0049.2018.0801.1601 08/01/2018
[  235.577095] Workqueue: ath11k_qmi_driver_event ath11k_qmi_driver_event_work [ath11k]
[  235.577096] Call Trace:
[  235.577100]  dump_stack+0x77/0xa0
[  235.577102]  mark_lock_irq.cold+0x15/0x3c
[  235.577104]  mark_lock+0x1d7/0x540
[  235.577105]  mark_usage+0xc7/0x140
[  235.577107]  __lock_acquire+0x219/0x6e0
[  235.577108]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xb0
[  235.577110]  lock_acquire+0xb6/0x270
[  235.577116]  ? ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577118]  ? atomic_notifier_chain_register+0x2d/0x40
[  235.577120]  _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x70
[  235.577125]  ? ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577130]  ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577136]  __ath11k_mac_register+0x3fb/0x480 [ath11k]
[  235.577141]  ath11k_mac_register+0x119/0x180 [ath11k]
[  235.577146]  ath11k_core_pdev_create+0x17/0xe0 [ath11k]
[  235.577150]  ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready.part.0+0x65/0x160 [ath11k]
[  235.577155]  ath11k_qmi_driver_event_work+0x1c5/0x230 [ath11k]
[  235.577158]  process_one_work+0x265/0x5d0
[  235.577160]  worker_thread+0x49/0x300
[  235.577161]  ? process_one_work+0x5d0/0x5d0
[  235.577163]  kthread+0x135/0x150
[  235.577164]  ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x60/0x60
[  235.577166]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1

Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1601399736-3210-7-git-send-email-kvalo@codeaurora.org
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2020
…u_desc

With SLUB DEBUG CONFIG below crash is seen as kmem_cache_alloc
is being called in non-atomic context.

To fix this issue, use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL kzalloc.

[  357.217088] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:498
[  357.217091] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/0
[  357.217092] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[  357.217095] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W         5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ torvalds#196
[  357.217096] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC8i7HVK/NUC8i7HVB, BIOS HNKBLi70.86A.0049.2018.0801.1601 08/01/2018
[  357.217097] Call Trace:
[  357.217098]  <IRQ>
[  357.217107]  ? ath11k_dp_htt_get_ppdu_desc+0xa9/0x170 [ath11k]
[  357.217110]  dump_stack+0x77/0xa0
[  357.217113]  ___might_sleep.cold+0xa6/0xb6
[  357.217116]  kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1f2/0x270
[  357.217122]  ath11k_dp_htt_get_ppdu_desc+0xa9/0x170 [ath11k]
[  357.217129]  ath11k_htt_pull_ppdu_stats.isra.0+0x96/0x270 [ath11k]
[  357.217135]  ath11k_dp_htt_htc_t2h_msg_handler+0xe7/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  357.217137]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0x100
[  357.217143]  ath11k_htc_rx_completion_handler+0x207/0x370 [ath11k]
[  357.217149]  ath11k_ce_recv_process_cb+0x15e/0x1e0 [ath11k]
[  357.217151]  ? handle_irq_event+0x70/0xa8
[  357.217154]  ath11k_pci_ce_tasklet+0x10/0x30 [ath11k_pci]
[  357.217157]  tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xd4/0xf0
[  357.217160]  __do_softirq+0xc9/0x482
[  357.217162]  asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20
[  357.217163]  </IRQ>
[  357.217166]  do_softirq_own_stack+0x49/0x60
[  357.217167]  irq_exit_rcu+0x9a/0xd0
[  357.217169]  common_interrupt+0xa1/0x190
[  357.217171]  asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
[  357.217173] RIP: 0010:cpu_idle_poll.isra.0+0x2e/0x60
[  357.217175] Code: 8b 35 26 27 74 69 e8 11 c8 3d ff e8 bc fa 42 ff e8 e7 9f 4a ff fb 65 48 8b 1c 25 80 90 01 00 48 8b 03 a8 08 74 0b eb 1c f3 90 <48> 8b 03 a8 08 75 13 8b 0
[  357.217177] RSP: 0018:ffffffff97403ee0 EFLAGS: 00000202
[  357.217178] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffffffff9742b8c0 RCX: 0000000000b890ca
[  357.217180] RDX: 0000000000b890ca RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff968d0c49
[  357.217181] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
[  357.217182] R10: ffffffff9742b8c0 R11: 0000000000000046 R12: 0000000000000000
[  357.217183] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000066fdf520
[  357.217186]  ? cpu_idle_poll.isra.0+0x19/0x60
[  357.217189]  do_idle+0x5f/0xe0
[  357.217191]  cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
[  357.217193]  start_kernel+0x443/0x464
[  357.217196]  secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0

Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1

Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1601399736-3210-8-git-send-email-kvalo@codeaurora.org
heftig referenced this pull request in zen-kernel/zen-kernel Nov 5, 2020
…u_desc

[ Upstream commit 6a8be1b ]

With SLUB DEBUG CONFIG below crash is seen as kmem_cache_alloc
is being called in non-atomic context.

To fix this issue, use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL kzalloc.

[  357.217088] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:498
[  357.217091] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/0
[  357.217092] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[  357.217095] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W         5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ #196
[  357.217096] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC8i7HVK/NUC8i7HVB, BIOS HNKBLi70.86A.0049.2018.0801.1601 08/01/2018
[  357.217097] Call Trace:
[  357.217098]  <IRQ>
[  357.217107]  ? ath11k_dp_htt_get_ppdu_desc+0xa9/0x170 [ath11k]
[  357.217110]  dump_stack+0x77/0xa0
[  357.217113]  ___might_sleep.cold+0xa6/0xb6
[  357.217116]  kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1f2/0x270
[  357.217122]  ath11k_dp_htt_get_ppdu_desc+0xa9/0x170 [ath11k]
[  357.217129]  ath11k_htt_pull_ppdu_stats.isra.0+0x96/0x270 [ath11k]
[  357.217135]  ath11k_dp_htt_htc_t2h_msg_handler+0xe7/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  357.217137]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0x100
[  357.217143]  ath11k_htc_rx_completion_handler+0x207/0x370 [ath11k]
[  357.217149]  ath11k_ce_recv_process_cb+0x15e/0x1e0 [ath11k]
[  357.217151]  ? handle_irq_event+0x70/0xa8
[  357.217154]  ath11k_pci_ce_tasklet+0x10/0x30 [ath11k_pci]
[  357.217157]  tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xd4/0xf0
[  357.217160]  __do_softirq+0xc9/0x482
[  357.217162]  asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20
[  357.217163]  </IRQ>
[  357.217166]  do_softirq_own_stack+0x49/0x60
[  357.217167]  irq_exit_rcu+0x9a/0xd0
[  357.217169]  common_interrupt+0xa1/0x190
[  357.217171]  asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
[  357.217173] RIP: 0010:cpu_idle_poll.isra.0+0x2e/0x60
[  357.217175] Code: 8b 35 26 27 74 69 e8 11 c8 3d ff e8 bc fa 42 ff e8 e7 9f 4a ff fb 65 48 8b 1c 25 80 90 01 00 48 8b 03 a8 08 74 0b eb 1c f3 90 <48> 8b 03 a8 08 75 13 8b 0
[  357.217177] RSP: 0018:ffffffff97403ee0 EFLAGS: 00000202
[  357.217178] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffffffff9742b8c0 RCX: 0000000000b890ca
[  357.217180] RDX: 0000000000b890ca RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff968d0c49
[  357.217181] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
[  357.217182] R10: ffffffff9742b8c0 R11: 0000000000000046 R12: 0000000000000000
[  357.217183] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000066fdf520
[  357.217186]  ? cpu_idle_poll.isra.0+0x19/0x60
[  357.217189]  do_idle+0x5f/0xe0
[  357.217191]  cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
[  357.217193]  start_kernel+0x443/0x464
[  357.217196]  secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0

Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1

Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1601399736-3210-8-git-send-email-kvalo@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
heftig referenced this pull request in zen-kernel/zen-kernel Nov 5, 2020
…adlock

[ Upstream commit df64880 ]

After base_lock which occupy by ath11k_regd_update, the softirq run for
WMI_REG_CHAN_LIST_CC_EVENTID maybe arrived and it also need to accuire
the spin lock, then deadlock happend, change to disable softirqis to solve it.

[  235.576990] ================================
[  235.576991] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[  235.576993] 5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ #196 Not tainted
[  235.576994] --------------------------------
[  235.576995] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[  235.576997] kworker/u16:1/98 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[  235.576998] ffff9655f75cad98 (&ab->base_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577009] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[  235.577013]   __lock_acquire+0x219/0x6e0
[  235.577015]   lock_acquire+0xb6/0x270
[  235.577018]   _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x70
[  235.577023]   ath11k_reg_chan_list_event.isra.0+0x10d/0x1e0 [ath11k]
[  235.577028]   ath11k_wmi_tlv_op_rx+0x3c3/0x560 [ath11k]
[  235.577033]   ath11k_htc_rx_completion_handler+0x207/0x370 [ath11k]
[  235.577039]   ath11k_ce_recv_process_cb+0x15e/0x1e0 [ath11k]
[  235.577041]   ath11k_pci_ce_tasklet+0x10/0x30 [ath11k_pci]
[  235.577043]   tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xd4/0xf0
[  235.577045]   __do_softirq+0xc9/0x482
[  235.577046]   asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20
[  235.577048]   do_softirq_own_stack+0x49/0x60
[  235.577049]   irq_exit_rcu+0x9a/0xd0
[  235.577050]   common_interrupt+0xa1/0x190
[  235.577052]   asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
[  235.577053]   cpu_idle_poll.isra.0+0x2e/0x60
[  235.577055]   do_idle+0x5f/0xe0
[  235.577056]   cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
[  235.577058]   start_kernel+0x443/0x464
[  235.577060]   secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[  235.577061] irq event stamp: 432035
[  235.577063] hardirqs last  enabled at (432035): [<ffffffff968d12b4>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x40
[  235.577064] hardirqs last disabled at (432034): [<ffffffff968d10d3>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x63/0x80
[  235.577066] softirqs last  enabled at (431998): [<ffffffff967115c1>] inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs+0x3f1/0x430
[  235.577067] softirqs last disabled at (431996): [<ffffffff9671159f>] inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs+0x3cf/0x430
[  235.577068]
[  235.577068] other info that might help us debug this:
[  235.577069]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  235.577069]
[  235.577070]        CPU0
[  235.577070]        ----
[  235.577071]   lock(&ab->base_lock);
[  235.577072]   <Interrupt>
[  235.577073]     lock(&ab->base_lock);
[  235.577074]
[  235.577074]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  235.577074]
[  235.577075] 3 locks held by kworker/u16:1/98:
[  235.577076]  #0: ffff9655f75b1d48 ((wq_completion)ath11k_qmi_driver_event){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d3/0x5d0
[  235.577079]  #1: ffffa33cc02f3e70 ((work_completion)(&ab->qmi.event_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d3/0x5d0
[  235.577081]  #2: ffff9655f75cad50 (&ab->core_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready.part.0+0x4e/0x160 [ath11k]
[  235.577087]
[  235.577087] stack backtrace:
[  235.577088] CPU: 3 PID: 98 Comm: kworker/u16:1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ #196
[  235.577089] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC8i7HVK/NUC8i7HVB, BIOS HNKBLi70.86A.0049.2018.0801.1601 08/01/2018
[  235.577095] Workqueue: ath11k_qmi_driver_event ath11k_qmi_driver_event_work [ath11k]
[  235.577096] Call Trace:
[  235.577100]  dump_stack+0x77/0xa0
[  235.577102]  mark_lock_irq.cold+0x15/0x3c
[  235.577104]  mark_lock+0x1d7/0x540
[  235.577105]  mark_usage+0xc7/0x140
[  235.577107]  __lock_acquire+0x219/0x6e0
[  235.577108]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xb0
[  235.577110]  lock_acquire+0xb6/0x270
[  235.577116]  ? ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577118]  ? atomic_notifier_chain_register+0x2d/0x40
[  235.577120]  _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x70
[  235.577125]  ? ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577130]  ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k]
[  235.577136]  __ath11k_mac_register+0x3fb/0x480 [ath11k]
[  235.577141]  ath11k_mac_register+0x119/0x180 [ath11k]
[  235.577146]  ath11k_core_pdev_create+0x17/0xe0 [ath11k]
[  235.577150]  ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready.part.0+0x65/0x160 [ath11k]
[  235.577155]  ath11k_qmi_driver_event_work+0x1c5/0x230 [ath11k]
[  235.577158]  process_one_work+0x265/0x5d0
[  235.577160]  worker_thread+0x49/0x300
[  235.577161]  ? process_one_work+0x5d0/0x5d0
[  235.577163]  kthread+0x135/0x150
[  235.577164]  ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x60/0x60
[  235.577166]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1

Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1601399736-3210-7-git-send-email-kvalo@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
alistair23 pushed a commit to alistair23/linux that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2021
Update 5.4-2.2.x-imx to stable v5.4.84
chombourger pushed a commit to chombourger/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2021
…from plsdk-3125 to processor-sdk-linux-4.19.y

* commit 'bcada72bd7ebad1ff5ef724f55af614fcc1c682a':
  ptp: cleanup timestamp event queue when extts is disabled
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors:

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #70: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:70:
    +static u8 halbtcoutsrc_IsBtCoexistAvailable(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#104: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:104:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_LeaveLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#117: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:117:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_EnterLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#130: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:130:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_NormalLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#152: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:152:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_LeaveLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#187: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:187:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_NormalLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#196: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:196:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_DisableLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 bLowPwrDisable)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#205: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:205:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_AggregationCheck(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#283: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:283:
    +static u32 halbtcoutsrc_GetWifiLinkStatus(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:311:
    +static u32 halbtcoutsrc_GetBtPatchVer(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#342: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:342:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:448:
    +			struct RT_LINK_DETECT_T * plinkinfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#510: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:510:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#645: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:645:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_DisplayFwPwrModeCmd(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#661: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:661:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#673: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:673:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#685: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:685:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#697: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:697:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#709: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:709:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#749: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:749:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo *	bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#761: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:761:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST *	pBtCoexist = (struct BTC_COEXIST *)pBtcContext;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#772: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:772:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #785: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:785:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#797: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:797:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#809: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:809:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#821: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:821:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#857: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:857:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#869: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:869:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo *		bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#891: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:891:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST *		pBtCoexist = &GLBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#917: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:917:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#963: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:963:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#975: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:975:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 bWifiOnly)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#988: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:988:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1003: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1003:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1030: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1030:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1053: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1053:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1082: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1082:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 action)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1108: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1108:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, enum RT_MEDIA_STATUS mediaStatus)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1135: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1135:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pktType)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1166: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1166:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_BtInfoNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1184: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1184:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1197: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1197:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1213: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1213:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1258: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1258:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_DisplayBtCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors:

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #70: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:70:
    +static u8 halbtcoutsrc_IsBtCoexistAvailable(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#104: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:104:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_LeaveLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#117: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:117:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_EnterLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#130: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:130:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_NormalLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#152: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:152:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_LeaveLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#187: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:187:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_NormalLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#196: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:196:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_DisableLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 bLowPwrDisable)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#205: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:205:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_AggregationCheck(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#283: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:283:
    +static u32 halbtcoutsrc_GetWifiLinkStatus(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:311:
    +static u32 halbtcoutsrc_GetBtPatchVer(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#342: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:342:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:448:
    +			struct RT_LINK_DETECT_T * plinkinfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#510: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:510:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#645: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:645:
    +static void halbtcoutsrc_DisplayFwPwrModeCmd(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#661: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:661:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#673: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:673:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#685: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:685:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#697: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:697:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#709: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:709:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#749: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:749:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo *	bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#761: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:761:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST *	pBtCoexist = (struct BTC_COEXIST *)pBtcContext;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#772: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:772:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #785: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:785:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#797: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:797:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#809: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:809:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#821: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:821:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#857: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:857:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#869: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:869:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo *		bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#891: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:891:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST *		pBtCoexist = &GLBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#917: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:917:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#963: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:963:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#975: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:975:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 bWifiOnly)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#988: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:988:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1003: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1003:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1030: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1030:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1053: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1053:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1082: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1082:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 action)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1108: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1108:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, enum RT_MEDIA_STATUS mediaStatus)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1135: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1135:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pktType)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1166: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1166:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_BtInfoNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1184: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1184:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1197: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1197:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1213: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1213:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#1258: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1258:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_DisplayBtCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210315170618.2566-18-marcocesati@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
TheSven73 pushed a commit to TheSven73/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2021
intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2023
The current codebase calls the function no matter net device has XDP
programs or not. So the finalize function is being called everytime when RX
bottom-half in progress. It needs a few machine instructions for nothing
in the case that XDP programs are not attached at all.

Lets it call the function on a condition that if xdp_status variable has
not zero value. That means XDP programs are attached to the net device
and it should be finalized based on the variable.

The following instructions show that it's better than calling the function
unconditionally.

  0.31 │6b8:   ldr     w0, [sp, torvalds#196]
       │    ┌──cbz     w0, 6cc
       │    │  mov     x1, x0
       │    │  mov     x0, x27
       │    │→ bl     stmmac_finalize_xdp_rx
       │6cc:└─→ldr    x1, [sp, torvalds#176]

with 'if (xdp_status)' statement, jump to '6cc' label if xdp_status has
zero value.

Signed-off-by: Leesoo Ahn <lsahn@ooseel.net>
Mina-Chou pushed a commit to andestech/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2025
Previously, the atcspi200 driver only supported SPI NOR flash.
However, due to ticket 26070, a customer requested that the atcspi200 driver
support SPI slave devices.Therefore, this functionality has been added.

Since we do not have the customer's slave device, the testing was
conducted using an SPI NOR flash as a substitute, and we used the read
ID command to verify if it met expectations.

Reformed from the following patches on ast-v5_4_0-branch:
- (ba7d2e8) spi: andes: spi-atcspi200: Fix compile warning (torvalds#196)

Signed-off-by: Locus Wei-Han Chen <locus84@andestech.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.andestech.com/RD-SW/linux/pulls/155
Reviewed-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: randolph <randolph@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Shih-Ting OuYang <tim609@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: CL Chin-Long Wang <cl634@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Charles Ci-Jyun Wu <dminus@andestech.com>
Co-authored-by: Locus Wei-Han Chen <locus84@andestech.com>
Co-committed-by: Locus Wei-Han Chen <locus84@andestech.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants