-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
Revert STS changes from 1.4 branch #175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@JimmyCYJ @kyessenov @bianpengyuan @jplevyak heads up, we (@duderino @mandarjog @howardjohn and @PiotrSikora) want to remove all STS changes from OSS Istio release-1.4 (but not master and release-1.5) and keep them Google internal (we don't care that OSS sees them, but we think they are too much code to be introduced into an OSS patch release). So I reverting all STS commits made by you in this PR. Once this is merged we will cherry pick in the commits from today's 1.4.6 security release. I'll also do something similar for the istio/proxy repo. |
Heads up that some changes are actually bug fixes (e.g. gRPC metadata is not working in 1.4). |
This file contains a fix for CreatingInitialMetadata: 7cf7f62#diff-3367fe470b910c37aac0a6fd5856a936 (I should have separated it into a difference PR, but anyway..) I can send a PR with only that fix after this reverting is merged. |
@bianpengyuan @kyessenov none of the commits I reverted were shipped in OSS Istio 1.4.6, so if you want them to go out in 1.4.7, please readd them later. Once this is merged, then we want to cherrypick in the security fixes, tag it 1.4.6, and then you can send your PRs |
/test test-tsan_envoy_release-1.4 |
/test test-asan_envoy_release-1.4 |
@PiotrSikora looks like the wasm stress test is still present in this branch and its complaining. I find that a bit surprising because it should be passing now that I've effectively rolled the branch back in time, but I could also just remove the stress test anyways. Thoughts? |
I get it, I have reverted commits to effectively bring us back to #133 ... which was before istio/envoy ran automated tests. So I shouldn't expect these tests to pass ;) |
@duderino: The following tests failed, say
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Closing this in favor of #180 which cherry picked additional fixes for the failing integration and stress tests |
Fixes istio#175 Signed-off-by: Alyssa Wilk <alyssar@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: JP Simard <jp@jpsim.com>
This reverts all STS changes except for e0ecba3 which I'm still figuring out how to handle. Will address that in a subsequent PR.