-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Release notes for v1.1.0 #4860
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release notes for v1.1.0 #4860
Conversation
... release notes.
This also updates the nth, first and last example.
release notes/v1.1.0.md
Outdated
|
||
## _Optional_ Roadmap | ||
|
||
_Discussion of future plans_ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Something you would like to add here? cc/ @grafana/k6-core
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe @oleiade 's functional testing ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added some elements, thanks for the heads-up folks 🙇🏻
release notes/v1.1.0.md
Outdated
|
||
## Breaking changes | ||
|
||
### Remove experimental `k6/experimental/webcrypto` module [#4851](https://github.com/grafana/k6/pull/4851) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In theory, this isn't a breaking change. Otherwise, we should bump the major. We should move it somewhere else or clarify in some way that this is a breaking change allowed from the stability guarantee because it is an experimental module.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer to leave it there in order to give it proper visibility, as anybody still using the experimental import path will encounter this.
Could you suggest a sentence to clarify what you said, please? I'll be happy to add it as an explanation next to the main title.
Co-authored-by: Mihail Stoykov <312246+mstoykov@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: İnanç Gümüş <inanc.gumus@grafana.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Just the proposed changes should be merged and it is ready.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, no additional suggestions on my side.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎉 🚀
dd7f835
Co-authored-by: Mihail Stoykov <312246+mstoykov@users.noreply.github.com>
What?
Release notes for k6 v1.1.0