Skip to content

Conversation

joanlopez
Copy link
Contributor

What?

Release notes for k6 v1.1.0


## _Optional_ Roadmap

_Discussion of future plans_
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something you would like to add here? cc/ @grafana/k6-core

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe @oleiade 's functional testing ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some elements, thanks for the heads-up folks 🙇🏻

@joanlopez joanlopez mentioned this pull request Jun 18, 2025
30 tasks

## Breaking changes

### Remove experimental `k6/experimental/webcrypto` module [#4851](https://github.com/grafana/k6/pull/4851)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In theory, this isn't a breaking change. Otherwise, we should bump the major. We should move it somewhere else or clarify in some way that this is a breaking change allowed from the stability guarantee because it is an experimental module.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@joanlopez joanlopez Jun 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd prefer to leave it there in order to give it proper visibility, as anybody still using the experimental import path will encounter this.

Could you suggest a sentence to clarify what you said, please? I'll be happy to add it as an explanation next to the main title.

joanlopez and others added 2 commits June 18, 2025 15:30
Co-authored-by: Mihail Stoykov <312246+mstoykov@users.noreply.github.com>
ankur22 and others added 2 commits June 25, 2025 08:51
Co-authored-by: İnanç Gümüş <inanc.gumus@grafana.com>
mstoykov
mstoykov previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mstoykov mstoykov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Just the proposed changes should be merged and it is ready.

codebien
codebien previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@codebien codebien left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, no additional suggestions on my side.

oleiade
oleiade previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@oleiade oleiade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 🚀

@inancgumus inancgumus dismissed stale reviews from oleiade, codebien, and mstoykov via dd7f835 June 25, 2025 13:22
inancgumus
inancgumus previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
Co-authored-by: Mihail Stoykov <312246+mstoykov@users.noreply.github.com>
mstoykov
mstoykov previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
oleiade
oleiade previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
mstoykov
mstoykov previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
ankur22
ankur22 previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
@joanlopez joanlopez merged commit 0e3fb95 into master Jun 25, 2025
37 of 39 checks passed
@joanlopez joanlopez deleted the release-v1.1.0 branch June 25, 2025 13:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants