Skip to content

feat(pricing-units): Add GQL for PricingUnit model #3830

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

floganz
Copy link
Contributor

@floganz floganz commented Jun 16, 2025

Context

Adding GQL interface for managing PricingUnit.

Description

Add pricing unit related permissions
Add pricing unit type, resolvers, create and update mutations

@floganz floganz self-assigned this Jun 16, 2025
@floganz floganz merged commit c74b7b3 into main Jun 16, 2025
14 checks passed
@floganz floganz deleted the ftr-add-gql-for-pricing-units branch June 16, 2025 11:03
groyoh added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
…L endpoint (#3835)

## Context

This commit was originally created to fix the API Keys GraphQL resolver pagination. But it was also fixed in #3830. Since I added some tests, I rebased and kept the tests.

## Description

This commit adds tests for ordering and paginating the API Keys GraphQL endpoint.
diegocharles pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2025
## Context

Adding GQL interface for managing PricingUnit.

## Description

Add pricing unit related permissions
Add pricing unit type, resolvers, create and update mutations
diegocharles pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2025
…L endpoint (#3835)

## Context

This commit was originally created to fix the API Keys GraphQL resolver pagination. But it was also fixed in #3830. Since I added some tests, I rebased and kept the tests.

## Description

This commit adds tests for ordering and paginating the API Keys GraphQL endpoint.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants