-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37.7k
depends: bump miniupnpc to 2.2.8 #30301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. Code CoverageFor detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report. ReviewsSee the guideline for information on the review process.
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update. ConflictsReviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first. |
Concept ACK. From the CI output, this has to wait for #30283 to be merged first, right? |
cc @laanwj |
🚧 At least one of the CI tasks failed. Make sure to run all tests locally, according to the Possibly this is due to a silent merge conflict (the changes in this pull request being Leave a comment here, if you need help tracking down a confusing failure. |
Marked as draft until #30283 is merged. |
Guix builds (on x86_64) [untrusted test-only build, possibly unsafe, not for production use]
|
Can rebase / undraft this now. |
Drops two of our patches that have been merged upstream and adjusts the other to deal with recent changes.
cbcf508
to
545bb6c
Compare
Guix builds (aarch64):
|
tACK 545bb6c I looked at the diff between the packaged 2.2.7 and 2.2.8. There's a Tested on macOS 14.5 with When I turn UPnP support off in the router:
When I turn it on:
My OPNSense router identifies this as So I'm not sure what Guix hashes:
|
🐙 This pull request conflicts with the target branch and needs rebase. |
I think #31130 is going to go in for |
yes... i dont think i've seen any PR that (uncontroversially) popular in my time here 😄 |
Woohoo! I like that much better than a bump :) |
Drops two of our patches that have been merged upstream and adjusts the other to deal with recent changes. Github-Pull: bitcoin#30301 Rebased-From: 545bb6c
Drops two of our patches that have been merged upstream and adjusts the other to deal with recent changes. Github-Pull: bitcoin#30301 Rebased-From: 545bb6c
Drops two of our patches that have been merged upstream and adjusts the other to deal with recent changes. Github-Pull: bitcoin#30301 Rebased-From: 545bb6c
Drops two of our patches that have been merged upstream and adjusts the other to deal with recent changes. Github-Pull: bitcoin#30301 Rebased-From: 545bb6c
Drops two of our patches that have been merged upstream and adjusts the other to deal with recent changes. Github-Pull: bitcoin#30301 Rebased-From: 545bb6c
Drops two of our patches that have been merged upstream and adjusts the other to deal with recent changes.
Follow-up from #30283. I can't vouch for the upstream changes here.