-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37.7k
build: patch qt libpng to fix powerpc build #19959
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This is an alternative to bitcoin#19751 that fixes the build without requiring splitting out libpng. This patch can be dropped once we are building qt 5.12.0 or later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK f07fb5a, the patch is the same as https://codereview.qt-project.org/gitweb?p=qt/qtbase.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/3rdparty/libpng/libpng.pro;h=a2f56669b47e09629b7a88a0964091404d6a9b06;hp=577b61d833f7842f3f0d6b1c94a3b3920006695c;hb=dc2aead842f4cdf74f9259d3606c53c8bdae2c6b;hpb=ceeecbae510af6e2d1ebbf865761e4761d404033
Gitian builds
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ConflictsReviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first. |
Gitian builds
|
f07fb5a build: patch qt libpng to fix powerpc build (fanquake) Pull request description: This is an alternative to bitcoin#19751 that fixes the build without requiring splitting out libpng. This patch can be dropped once we are building qt 5.12.0 or later. One of the [concerns posted in bitcoin#19751](bitcoin#19751 (comment)) was: > the one bundled with Qt is at best a slower "bare minimum". However for our usage, I don't think the performance of libpng is a concern. If it is, I'd like to see some numbers/justification as to why we should be worried about it. This patch should be enough to unblock PowerPC binaries (combined with other changes) for 0.21.0, and for 0.22.0, when we switch to qt 5.15.x in depends, we should be able to drop it. Related upstream issue: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-66388. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK f07fb5a theuni: ACK f07fb5a. hebasto: ACK f07fb5a, the patch is the same as https://codereview.qt-project.org/gitweb?p=qt/qtbase.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/3rdparty/libpng/libpng.pro;h=a2f56669b47e09629b7a88a0964091404d6a9b06;hp=577b61d833f7842f3f0d6b1c94a3b3920006695c;hb=dc2aead842f4cdf74f9259d3606c53c8bdae2c6b;hpb=ceeecbae510af6e2d1ebbf865761e4761d404033 Tree-SHA512: 865b843f5049eca80215774274fb7ae0dacccc3dd7f4a2eec93a73057115dcea85e715f919f96441424f9dd902dd97f0a238d96d4074babcee66b30577104009
This is an alternative to #19751 that fixes the build without requiring
splitting out libpng. This patch can be dropped once we are building qt
5.12.0 or later.
One of the concerns posted in #19751 was:
However for our usage, I don't think the performance of libpng is a concern. If it is, I'd like to see some numbers/justification as to why we should be worried about it.
This patch should be enough to unblock PowerPC binaries (combined with other changes) for 0.21.0, and for 0.22.0, when we switch to qt 5.15.x in depends, we should be able to drop it.
Related upstream issue: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-66388.