Skip to content

ipq806x: Revert "ipq806x: swap lan leds for Meraki MR52" #16779

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

rkboni
Copy link
Contributor

@rkboni rkboni commented Oct 24, 2024

ipq806x: Revert "ipq806x: swap lan leds for Meraki MR52"

This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1 / the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni rafal.boni@gmail.com

@github-actions github-actions bot added the target/ipq806x pull request/issue for ipq806x target label Oct 24, 2024
@namiltd
Copy link
Contributor

namiltd commented Oct 25, 2024

"cherry selected from commit" should be set only after merging the commit because its number will change.

@rkboni rkboni force-pushed the mr52-revert-lan-led-reversal-main branch 3 times, most recently from 5ac8f4f to 7929ae9 Compare October 25, 2024 20:51
@rkboni
Copy link
Contributor Author

rkboni commented Oct 25, 2024

"cherry selected from commit" should be set only after merging the commit because its number will change.

D'oh, good point. Per the advice in #16775, going to close that and will wait for this to be merged and then backport. Updated to remove the cherry-pick.

@rkboni rkboni force-pushed the mr52-revert-lan-led-reversal-main branch from 7929ae9 to f723337 Compare October 26, 2024 18:54
@rkboni rkboni changed the title Revert "ipq806x: swap lan leds for Meraki MR52" ipq806x: Revert "ipq806x: swap lan leds for Meraki MR52" Oct 28, 2024
@robimarko
Copy link
Contributor

Please allow editing by maintainers or rebase this

@rkboni
Copy link
Contributor Author

rkboni commented Oct 30, 2024

Please allow editing by maintainers or rebase this

Will rebase shortly -- but what do I need to do to allow editing by maintainers?

@robimarko
Copy link
Contributor

Please allow editing by maintainers or rebase this

Will rebase shortly -- but what do I need to do to allow editing by maintainers?

There should be a tick in the PR itself around the Participants info
https://docs.github.com/assets/cb-43689/mw-1440/images/help/pull_requests/allow-edits-and-access-by-maintainers.webp

@rkboni rkboni force-pushed the mr52-revert-lan-led-reversal-main branch from f723337 to f150596 Compare October 30, 2024 13:58
@rkboni
Copy link
Contributor Author

rkboni commented Oct 30, 2024

Please allow editing by maintainers or rebase this

Will rebase shortly -- but what do I need to do to allow editing by maintainers?

There should be a tick in the PR itself around the Participants info https://docs.github.com/assets/cb-43689/mw-1440/images/help/pull_requests/allow-edits-and-access-by-maintainers.webp

Hmm, I rebased but I can't find this option either when looking at the PR in either https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt or my (org) fork's. GitHub help agrees with your assertion that there should be a checkbox, but I don't see it :/

@rkboni
Copy link
Contributor Author

rkboni commented Oct 30, 2024

Please allow editing by maintainers or rebase this

Will rebase shortly -- but what do I need to do to allow editing by maintainers?

There should be a tick in the PR itself around the Participants info https://docs.github.com/assets/cb-43689/mw-1440/images/help/pull_requests/allow-edits-and-access-by-maintainers.webp

Hmm, I rebased but I can't find this option either when looking at the PR in either https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt or my (org) fork's. GitHub help agrees with your assertion that there should be a checkbox, but I don't see it :/

For the record: this appears to be because I forked into an org: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/5634 :/

@rkboni
Copy link
Contributor Author

rkboni commented Oct 30, 2024

Moved my repos around so that the base repo is now in my personal account and the second-hand clones for various other OpenWRT projects / hardware support forks are in my org, and enabled maintainer edits.

This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
@robimarko robimarko force-pushed the mr52-revert-lan-led-reversal-main branch from f150596 to b5e1544 Compare October 30, 2024 14:51
@openwrt-bot openwrt-bot merged commit b5e1544 into openwrt:main Oct 30, 2024
1 check passed
@robimarko
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks! Rebased on top of main and merged!

rkboni added a commit to rkboni/openwrt that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit b5e1544)
Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
rkboni added a commit to rkboni/openwrt that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit b5e1544)
Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
rkboni added a commit to rkboni/openwrt that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit b5e1544)
Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
robimarko pushed a commit to rkboni/openwrt that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
(cherry picked from commit b5e1544)
Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16822
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
@rkboni rkboni deleted the mr52-revert-lan-led-reversal-main branch October 31, 2024 17:06
vincejv pushed a commit to vincejv/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
vincejv pushed a commit to vincejv/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
vincejv pushed a commit to vincejv/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Ra2-IFV pushed a commit to Ra2-IFV/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Vladdrako pushed a commit to Vladdrako/openwrt that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
M3m3M4n pushed a commit to M3m3M4n/openwrt that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2025
This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
maurerr pushed a commit to maurerr/openwrt that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2025
This reverts commit ec8f647, as with the
current kernel version, the change actually causes the same bug it once
may have fixed -- that is, the leds are now again reversed.

I suspect this was due to a switch to a newer kernel version between when
the patch was submitted and now reversing the order of the interfaces, so
that eth0 / the LAN interface is also the interface used for PoE, and eth1
/ the WAN interface is the non-PoE interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Boni <rafal.boni@gmail.com>
Link: openwrt#16779
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
target/ipq806x pull request/issue for ipq806x target
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants