-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 998
allow remote binary customization #6013
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
I don't use this feature so this is more just a comment, but the existing documentation already recommends using an alias for
So that case of "let the remote user specify what wp is" seems already covered by existing practices. |
non-interactive mode is not firing a "login-shell". |
This is covered in the sections above on that same link: Mostly just trying to gauge if this addresses a real problem that in some cases isn't possible with current advice -- ie: is there a situation where you can set an ENV var on remote but can't do the steps above? Or if it is just another way to accomplish that. |
It addresses the problem in a way that doesn't need any hook nor modification on the remote server (like
(and the diff in the codebase is just one-line) |
8dddec7
to
beb9b8a
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
I think Suggesting because these should also end up documented here in the list of all available ENV Vars that WP CLI supports and every other use of |
I'm fine renaming it for whatever gets your preference. Just let me know. |
|
…o `sudo -u user /some/wp` would also allow running remote `wp-cli` under a distinct user
ff9677b
to
6c736ef
Compare
Could be set to use
/custom/path/wp
on the remote end but alsosudo -u user /some/wp
to allow running wp under a distinct user.See also #5974