Skip to content

Add non-normative reference for XSLTProcessor #738

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cvrebert
Copy link
Member

It still doesn't have a spec, but this seems to be the closest thing to one that currently exists.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/XSLTProcessor

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Feb 25, 2016

I linked to https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/012853bd80b7/dom/webidl/XSLTProcessor.webidl in Blink's IDL files as the closest thing to a spec I could find. Neither of these are really good references though.

Is it better than nothing? I dunno, I kind of think not. @annevk?

@Ms2ger
Copy link
Member

Ms2ger commented Feb 25, 2016

Create a wiki page for it, like we did for DOM XPath?

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Feb 25, 2016

Wow, all browsers support this. Yeah, a wiki page similar to https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/DOM_XPath and a bug against the DOM Standard. We should just define this.

@domenic domenic added the clarification Standard could be clearer label Feb 25, 2016
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Feb 29, 2016

@cvrebert is that something you would be interested in working on? Trying to figure out how to move forward here.

@cvrebert
Copy link
Member Author

@annevk Nope. Sprucing up the MDN article was enough work already, and I'm not an XSLTProcessor user.

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Feb 29, 2016

@domenic
Copy link
Member

domenic commented Feb 29, 2016

is the action item to update this PR to point to https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/DOM_XSLTProcessor now?

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Feb 29, 2016

I'm not sure, I was hoping someone else would make a call as to what is best here.

@domenic
Copy link
Member

domenic commented Feb 29, 2016

Hmm. I guess https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/DOM_XSLTProcessor is pretty good as it collates all known info in one place. Alternately maybe we should leave it with no reference.

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Feb 29, 2016

Pointing to https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/DOM_XSLTProcessor sounds good, at the very least it's a block of IDL that can be compared against the implementation.

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Feb 29, 2016

Okay, @cvrebert can you update the PR to point to that? Ta.

@cvrebert
Copy link
Member Author

@annevk Done.

annevk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2016
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Mar 1, 2016

Excellent, thank you. Landed as f5540d3. Love all these little fixes.

@annevk annevk closed this Mar 1, 2016
@cvrebert cvrebert deleted the XSLTProcessor branch March 1, 2016 07:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clarification Standard could be clearer
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants