Skip to content

Conversation

andreynering
Copy link
Contributor

@andreynering andreynering commented Jul 22, 2025

@andreynering andreynering self-assigned this Jul 22, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.58824% with 145 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 59.30%. Comparing base (7b50ad4) to head (b11de6c).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3423      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.34%   59.30%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         630      636       +6     
  Lines       53739    53932     +193     
==========================================
+ Hits        31889    31982      +93     
- Misses      21850    21950     +100     
Flag Coverage Δ
.-amd64 88.88% <ø> (ø)
cmds/...-amd64 49.15% <0.00%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
integration/generic-tests/...-amd64 30.51% <ø> (ø)
integration/generic-tests/...-arm 32.15% <ø> (ø)
integration/generic-tests/...-arm64 29.80% <ø> (ø)
integration/gotests/...-amd64 59.76% <71.75%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
integration/gotests/...-arm 60.38% <71.75%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
integration/gotests/...-arm64 60.63% <71.75%> (+0.24%) ⬆️
pkg/...-amd64 57.45% <72.95%> (+0.25%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
everything 64.19% <70.58%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
cmds/exp 31.19% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@andreynering andreynering force-pushed the more-coreutils branch 4 times, most recently from 05ca75d to ffafe9a Compare July 28, 2025 13:07
@AjanZhong
Copy link
Contributor

@andreynering Hi Andrey, we noticed that your PR failed at ARM integration test. Now we have fixed this ARM integration test issue, would you mind help rebase your PR, then Github CI will trigger integration test again. Thanks.

@andreynering andreynering force-pushed the more-coreutils branch 2 times, most recently from eaf7ea7 to bb6a223 Compare August 7, 2025 18:57
@andreynering andreynering marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2025 18:57
@andreynering
Copy link
Contributor Author

I implemented the missing core utils from my list (base64). The PR is ready to review.

I couple of fixes were made to base64 in the process, by the way:

  • It wasn't outputing with a ending line break like GNU does. Doing that now for compatibility.
  • Changed from base64.RawStdEncoding to base64.StdEncoding, also for compatilibity reasons.

@andreynering andreynering requested a review from rminnich August 7, 2025 19:01
Copy link
Member

@rminnich rminnich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is starting to come together.
Fingers crossed, there's a lot here, but it looks fine.

@andreynering andreynering enabled auto-merge (rebase) August 7, 2025 19:54
Signed-off-by: Andrey Nering <andreynering@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Nering <andreynering@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Nering <andreynering@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Nering <andreynering@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Nering <andreynering@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Nering <andreynering@users.noreply.github.com>
@andreynering andreynering merged commit 5e77210 into main Aug 7, 2025
31 checks passed
@andreynering andreynering deleted the more-coreutils branch August 7, 2025 20:06
andreynering added a commit to mvdan/sh that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
andreynering added a commit to mvdan/sh that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
andreynering added a commit to mvdan/sh that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants