-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 740
client: fix backoffer initialization (#9012) #9545
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: release-8.5
Are you sure you want to change the base?
client: fix backoffer initialization (#9012) #9545
Conversation
This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by triage owners. To merge this cherry pick:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@rleungx This PR has conflicts, I have hold it. |
@ti-chi-bot: ## If you want to know how to resolve it, please read the guide in TiDB Dev Guide. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
/hold cancel |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-8.5 #9545 +/- ##
===============================================
+ Coverage 75.61% 75.67% +0.05%
===============================================
Files 463 463
Lines 72510 72510
===============================================
+ Hits 54828 54870 +42
+ Misses 14179 14133 -46
- Partials 3503 3507 +4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bufferflies The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
This is an automated cherry-pick of #9012
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Close #9013. ref #8835.
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Release note