Skip to content

Conversation

capossele
Copy link
Contributor

@capossele capossele commented Mar 18, 2025

Fix a bug related to decode_seal, by not requiring verifier parameters when decoding a FakeReceipt

@capossele capossele requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2025 16:40
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Fix decode_seal WEB3-380: Fix decode_seal Mar 18, 2025
@capossele capossele enabled auto-merge (squash) March 18, 2025 17:07
@capossele capossele disabled auto-merge March 18, 2025 17:07
@capossele capossele marked this pull request as draft March 18, 2025 18:02
@capossele capossele marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2025 21:39
@capossele capossele force-pushed the angelo/fix-decode-seal branch 2 times, most recently from a8958dc to e320b16 Compare March 18, 2025 22:48
@capossele capossele merged commit 831f19f into main Mar 18, 2025
15 of 32 checks passed
@capossele capossele deleted the angelo/fix-decode-seal branch March 18, 2025 22:50
capossele added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025
Fix a bug related to `decode_seal`, by not requiring verifier parameters
when decoding a FakeReceipt
capossele added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025
Fix a bug related to `decode_seal`, by not requiring verifier parameters
when decoding a FakeReceipt
capossele added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2025
Fix a bug related to `decode_seal`, by not requiring verifier parameters
when decoding a FakeReceipt
capossele added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2025
Fix a bug related to `decode_seal`, by not requiring verifier parameters
when decoding a FakeReceipt
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants