Skip to content

Conversation

satler-git
Copy link
Contributor

closes #101650, which was already fixed.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 16, 2025

r? @lcnr

rustbot has assigned @lcnr.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 16, 2025
Comment on lines +14 to +16
let mut string_builder = String::new();
string_builder += &format!("Hello {}", helper().await);
string_builder
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
let mut string_builder = String::new();
string_builder += &format!("Hello {}", helper().await);
string_builder
format!("Hello {}", helper().await)

this should also already test test, does it not?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to that comment, format!(..) and string += &format!(..); are separate cases. The format!(..) case has already been tested in this file.

Also, it might be better to move the test into tests/ui/fmt and give it a new name.

Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me after nit

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented May 18, 2025

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 18, 2025

📌 Commit 067fe1f has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 18, 2025
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request May 18, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 18, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#127013 (Add `f16` formatting and parsing)
 - rust-lang#130887 (Safer implementation of RepeatN)
 - rust-lang#140154 (Cygwin support in rustc)
 - rust-lang#140874 (make `rustc_attr_parsing` less dominant in the rustc crate graph)
 - rust-lang#141094 (add regression test for rust-lang#101650)
 - rust-lang#141110 ([std] fix the presentation of `split_off_mut` and `split_off` documentation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 19, 2025
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#140049 (fix autodiff macro on generic functions)
 - rust-lang#140874 (make `rustc_attr_parsing` less dominant in the rustc crate graph)
 - rust-lang#141094 (add regression test for rust-lang#101650)
 - rust-lang#141110 ([std] fix the presentation of `split_off_mut` and `split_off` documentation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d5e59b8 into rust-lang:master May 19, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone May 19, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 19, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#141094 - satler-git:issue-101650, r=lcnr

add regression test for rust-lang#101650

closes rust-lang#101650, which was already fixed.
@satler-git satler-git deleted the issue-101650 branch May 20, 2025 05:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using the format!() macro with an async function makes the whole Future non-Send
4 participants