Skip to content

Conversation

Alexendoo
Copy link
Member

Several places in Clippy want to check all the attributes of a node, we end up using hir().attrs() from several different check_ functions (e.g. in our doc lints) but this is error prone, we recently found that doc lints weren't triggering on struct fields for example

I went to add a check_attributes function but realised enter_lint_attrs is already this, the rename is to encourage their use

Also removes LateContextAndPass::visit_attribute since it's unused - visit_attribute for HIR visitors is only called by hir().walk_attributes() which lint passes do not use

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 24, 2024

r? @oli-obk

rustbot has assigned @oli-obk.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 24, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 24, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Mar 25, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 25, 2024

📌 Commit 2cb5347 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 25, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122842 (Don't emit an error about failing to produce a file with a specific name if user never gave an explicit name)
 - rust-lang#122881 (Delegation: fix ICE on `bound_vars` divergence)
 - rust-lang#122910 (Validate that we're only matching on unit struct for path pattern)
 - rust-lang#122970 (Use `chunk_by` when building `ReverseSccGraph`)
 - rust-lang#122988 (add even more tests! )
 - rust-lang#122999 (Fix unpretty UI test when /tmp does not exist)
 - rust-lang#123001 (Rename `{enter,exit}_lint_attrs` to `check_attributes{,_post}`)
 - rust-lang#123022 (Add `async-closures/once.rs` back to cranelift tests)
 - rust-lang#123034 (Add a bunch of needs-unwind annotations to tests)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 10daf8a into rust-lang:master Mar 25, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Mar 25, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123001 - Alexendoo:check-attributes, r=oli-obk

Rename `{enter,exit}_lint_attrs` to `check_attributes{,_post}`

Several places in Clippy want to check all the attributes of a node, we end up using `hir().attrs()` from several different `check_` functions (e.g. [in our doc lints](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/95c62ffae9bbce793f68a6f1473e3fc24af19bdd/clippy_lints/src/doc/mod.rs#L396)) but this is error prone, we recently found that doc lints weren't triggering on struct fields for example

I went to add a `check_attributes` function but realised `enter_lint_attrs` is already this, the rename is to encourage their use

Also removes `LateContextAndPass::visit_attribute` since it's unused - `visit_attribute` for HIR visitors is only called by `hir().walk_attributes()` which lint passes do not use
@Alexendoo Alexendoo deleted the check-attributes branch March 25, 2024 22:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants