Fix malformed suggestion for repeated maybe unsized bounds #127717
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
compiler-errors
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2024
|
@bors r+ rollup |
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2024
…mpiler-errors Fix malformed suggestion for repeated maybe unsized bounds Fixes rust-lang#127441 Now when we encounter something like `foo(a : impl ?Sized + ?Sized)`, instead of suggesting removal of both bounds and leaving `foo(a: impl )` behind, we suggest changing the first bound to `Sized` and removing the second bound, resulting in `foo(a: impl Sized)`. Although the issue was reported for impl trait types, it also occurred with regular param bounds. So if we encounter `foo<T: ?Sized + ?Sized>(a: T)` we now detect that all the bounds are `?Sized` and therefore emit the suggestion to remove the entire predicate `: ?Sized + ?Sized` resulting in `foo<T>(a: T)`. Lastly, if we encounter a situation where some of the bounds are something other than `?Sized`, then we emit separate removal suggestions for each `?Sized` bound. E.g. if we see `foo(a: impl ?Sized + Bar + ?Sized)` or `foo<T: ?Sized + Bar + ?Sized>(a: T)` we emit suggestions such that the user will be left with `foo(a : impl Bar)` or `foo<T: Bar>(a: T)` respectively.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#126548 (Improved clarity of documentation for std::fs::create_dir_all) - rust-lang#127528 (Replace ASCII control chars with Unicode Control Pictures) - rust-lang#127717 (Fix malformed suggestion for repeated maybe unsized bounds) - rust-lang#128046 (Fix some `#[cfg_attr(not(doc), repr(..))]`) - rust-lang#128122 (Mark `missing_fragment_specifier` as `FutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps`) - rust-lang#128135 (std: use duplicate thread local state in tests) - rust-lang#128140 (Remove Unnecessary `.as_str()` Conversions) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122192 (Do not try to reveal hidden types when trying to prove auto-traits in the defining scope) - rust-lang#126042 (Implement `unsigned_signed_diff`) - rust-lang#126548 (Improved clarity of documentation for std::fs::create_dir_all) - rust-lang#127717 (Fix malformed suggestion for repeated maybe unsized bounds) - rust-lang#128046 (Fix some `#[cfg_attr(not(doc), repr(..))]`) - rust-lang#128122 (Mark `missing_fragment_specifier` as `FutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps`) - rust-lang#128135 (std: use duplicate thread local state in tests) - rust-lang#128140 (Remove Unnecessary `.as_str()` Conversions) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127717 - gurry:127441-stray-impl-sugg, r=compiler-errors Fix malformed suggestion for repeated maybe unsized bounds Fixes rust-lang#127441 Now when we encounter something like `foo(a : impl ?Sized + ?Sized)`, instead of suggesting removal of both bounds and leaving `foo(a: impl )` behind, we suggest changing the first bound to `Sized` and removing the second bound, resulting in `foo(a: impl Sized)`. Although the issue was reported for impl trait types, it also occurred with regular param bounds. So if we encounter `foo<T: ?Sized + ?Sized>(a: T)` we now detect that all the bounds are `?Sized` and therefore emit the suggestion to remove the entire predicate `: ?Sized + ?Sized` resulting in `foo<T>(a: T)`. Lastly, if we encounter a situation where some of the bounds are something other than `?Sized`, then we emit separate removal suggestions for each `?Sized` bound. E.g. if we see `foo(a: impl ?Sized + Bar + ?Sized)` or `foo<T: ?Sized + Bar + ?Sized>(a: T)` we emit suggestions such that the user will be left with `foo(a : impl Bar)` or `foo<T: Bar>(a: T)` respectively.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #127441
Now when we encounter something like
foo(a : impl ?Sized + ?Sized), instead of suggesting removal of both bounds and leavingfoo(a: impl )behind, we suggest changing the first bound toSizedand removing the second bound, resulting infoo(a: impl Sized).Although the issue was reported for impl trait types, it also occurred with regular param bounds. So if we encounter
foo<T: ?Sized + ?Sized>(a: T)we now detect that all the bounds are?Sizedand therefore emit the suggestion to remove the entire predicate: ?Sized + ?Sizedresulting infoo<T>(a: T).Lastly, if we encounter a situation where some of the bounds are something other than
?Sized, then we emit separate removal suggestions for each?Sizedbound. E.g. if we seefoo(a: impl ?Sized + Bar + ?Sized)orfoo<T: ?Sized + Bar + ?Sized>(a: T)we emit suggestions such that the user will be left withfoo(a : impl Bar)orfoo<T: Bar>(a: T)respectively.