Skip to content

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

@Zalathar Zalathar commented Jun 30, 2024

Several callers of unexpand_into_body_span_with_visible_macro would immediately discard the additional macro-related information, which is wasteful. We can avoid this by having them instead call a simpler method that just returns the span they care about.

This PR also moves the relevant functions out of coverage::spans::from_mir and into a new submodule coverage::unexpand, so that calling them from coverage::mappings is less awkward.

There should be no actual changes to coverage-instrumentation output, as demonstrated by the absence of test updates.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 30, 2024

r? @cjgillot

rustbot has assigned @cjgillot.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 30, 2024

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) labels Jun 30, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

These particular callers don't actually use the returned macro information, so
they can use a simpler span-unexpansion function that doesn't return it.
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 30, 2024

📌 Commit 6c33149 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 30, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2024
coverage: Avoid getting extra unexpansion info when we don't need it

Several callers of `unexpand_into_body_span_with_visible_macro` would immediately discard the additional macro-related information, which is wasteful. We can avoid this by having them instead call a simpler method that just returns the span they care about.

This PR also moves the relevant functions out of `coverage::spans::from_mir` and into a new submodule `coverage::unexpand`, so that calling them from `coverage::mappings` is less awkward.

There should be no actual changes to coverage-instrumentation output, as demonstrated by the absence of test updates.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#126018 (Remove the `box_pointers` lint.)
 - rust-lang#126895 (Fix simd_gather documentation)
 - rust-lang#126981 (Replace some magic booleans in match-lowering with enums)
 - rust-lang#127069 (small correction to fmt::Pointer impl)
 - rust-lang#127157 (coverage: Avoid getting extra unexpansion info when we don't need it)
 - rust-lang#127160 (Add a regression test for rust-lang#123630)
 - rust-lang#127161 (Improve `run-make-support` library `args` API)
 - rust-lang#127162 (Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#126018 (Remove the `box_pointers` lint.)
 - rust-lang#126895 (Fix simd_gather documentation)
 - rust-lang#126981 (Replace some magic booleans in match-lowering with enums)
 - rust-lang#127038 (Update test comment)
 - rust-lang#127053 (Update the LoongArch target documentation)
 - rust-lang#127069 (small correction to fmt::Pointer impl)
 - rust-lang#127157 (coverage: Avoid getting extra unexpansion info when we don't need it)
 - rust-lang#127160 (Add a regression test for rust-lang#123630)
 - rust-lang#127161 (Improve `run-make-support` library `args` API)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#126018 (Remove the `box_pointers` lint.)
 - rust-lang#126895 (Fix simd_gather documentation)
 - rust-lang#126981 (Replace some magic booleans in match-lowering with enums)
 - rust-lang#127038 (Update test comment)
 - rust-lang#127053 (Update the LoongArch target documentation)
 - rust-lang#127069 (small correction to fmt::Pointer impl)
 - rust-lang#127157 (coverage: Avoid getting extra unexpansion info when we don't need it)
 - rust-lang#127160 (Add a regression test for rust-lang#123630)
 - rust-lang#127161 (Improve `run-make-support` library `args` API)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b2aebc1 into rust-lang:master Jun 30, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jun 30, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127157 - Zalathar:unexpand, r=cjgillot

coverage: Avoid getting extra unexpansion info when we don't need it

Several callers of `unexpand_into_body_span_with_visible_macro` would immediately discard the additional macro-related information, which is wasteful. We can avoid this by having them instead call a simpler method that just returns the span they care about.

This PR also moves the relevant functions out of `coverage::spans::from_mir` and into a new submodule `coverage::unexpand`, so that calling them from `coverage::mappings` is less awkward.

There should be no actual changes to coverage-instrumentation output, as demonstrated by the absence of test updates.
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the unexpand branch June 30, 2024 23:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants