fix few typos in filecheck annotations #125007
Conversation
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
|
Some changes occurred in tests/codegen/sanitizer cc @rust-lang/project-exploit-mitigations, @rcvalle |
|
Funny thing: rgrepped llvm sources and they contain few the same typos. |
|
I don't think case-insensitive matching is worthwhile. Some kind of lint in tidy or file check does seem like a potential improvement though. @bors r+ rollup=iffy |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (3349155): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 675.433s -> 673.703s (-0.26%) |
Inspired by #123886 (comment)
rg -g '*.rs' '//\s+?[\w-]+(-[\w]+):' -r '$1' -oNI | sort -uShould https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.html#cmdoption-FileCheck-ignore-case be used for case-insensetive match for filecheck?