Skip to content

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

@Zalathar Zalathar commented Dec 7, 2023

Pulling this merge step out of push_refined_span and into a separate pass lets us push directly to refined_spans instead of calling a helper method.

Because the compiler can now see partial borrows of refined_spans, we can remove some extra code that was jumping through hoops to satisfy the borrow checker.


@rustbot label +A-code-coverage

This makes `push_refined_span` trivial, which will let us inline it and benefit
from partial borrows of `refined_spans`.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 7, 2023

r? @davidtwco

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 7, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 7, 2023

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@rustbot rustbot added the A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) label Dec 7, 2023
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 7, 2023

📌 Commit 9a43215 has been approved by davidtwco

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 7, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2023
coverage: Merge refined spans in a separate final pass

Pulling this merge step out of `push_refined_span` and into a separate pass lets us push directly to `refined_spans` instead of calling a helper method.

Because the compiler can now see partial borrows of `refined_spans`, we can remove some extra code that was jumping through hoops to satisfy the borrow checker.

---

`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118505 (Elaborate on ip_addr bit conversion endianness)
 - rust-lang#118581 (OnceLock: Add note about drop and statics)
 - rust-lang#118677 ([rustdoc] Fix display of features)
 - rust-lang#118690 (coverage: Avoid unnecessary macros in unit tests)
 - rust-lang#118693 (Tell MirUsedCollector that the pointer alignment checks calls its panic symbol)
 - rust-lang#118695 (coverage: Merge refined spans in a separate final pass)
 - rust-lang#118709 (fix jobserver GLOBAL_CLIENT_CHECKED uninitialized before use)
 - rust-lang#118722 (rustdoc: remove unused parameter `reversed` from onEach(Lazy))

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f7c892e into rust-lang:master Dec 8, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Dec 8, 2023
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118695 - Zalathar:push-refined, r=davidtwco

coverage: Merge refined spans in a separate final pass

Pulling this merge step out of `push_refined_span` and into a separate pass lets us push directly to `refined_spans` instead of calling a helper method.

Because the compiler can now see partial borrows of `refined_spans`, we can remove some extra code that was jumping through hoops to satisfy the borrow checker.

---

``@rustbot`` label +A-code-coverage
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the push-refined branch December 8, 2023 10:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants