Skip to content

Conversation

cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

This removes a wrapper which is close to what adt_def does.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 30, 2022

r? @davidtwco

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 30, 2022
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 31, 2022

📌 Commit abc1ad7 has been approved by davidtwco

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 31, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2022
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103061 (Rewrite implementation of `#[alloc_error_handler]`)
 - rust-lang#103584 (Remove bounds check when array is indexed by enum)
 - rust-lang#103706 (Fix E0433 No Typo Suggestions)
 - rust-lang#103729 (interpret: fix align_of_val on packed types)
 - rust-lang#103759 (Use `adt_def` during type collection.)
 - rust-lang#103809 (Fix a typo in std::net mod doc comment)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 09f4f7c into rust-lang:master Nov 1, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 1, 2022
@cjgillot cjgillot deleted the adt-collect branch November 5, 2022 17:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants