Skip to content

Conversation

generall
Copy link
Member

@generall generall commented Mar 4, 2025

  • implement proper anonymization for json path
  • fmt

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 4, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the implementation of the anonymize method for the JsonPath structure. The method now extracts two fields from the instance: first_key and rest. An anonymized version of first_key is created using its own anonymization logic to produce a hash value. Subsequently, the method iterates over the rest vector of items. For each item in rest, if the item represents a key, the anonymization is applied; if it is an index, it is retained; and if it is a wildcard index, it remains unchanged. The anonymized first_key and the transformed vector of items are then used to construct a new JsonPath instance. The method signature remains the same in the trait implementation, with only the internal functionality modified.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18eb433 and 1f143e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • lib/segment/src/json_path/mod.rs (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (13)
  • GitHub Check: test-shard-snapshot-api-s3-minio
  • GitHub Check: test-low-resources
  • GitHub Check: test-snapshot-operations-s3-minio
  • GitHub Check: test-consistency
  • GitHub Check: Basic TLS/HTTPS tests
  • GitHub Check: test (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test-consensus-compose
  • GitHub Check: test-consensus
  • GitHub Check: test (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
lib/segment/src/json_path/mod.rs (1)

538-556: Comprehensive anonymization implementation looks good!

The implementation properly handles anonymization for all components of a JsonPath:

  1. The first_key is anonymized using its own anonymize method
  2. Each element in rest is appropriately transformed:
    • Keys are anonymized
    • Indices are preserved as-is
    • Wildcards remain unchanged

This ensures PII or sensitive data in path keys will be properly hashed while maintaining the path structure.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@generall generall requested a review from xzfc March 4, 2025 19:25
@generall generall merged commit 5078166 into dev Mar 4, 2025
17 checks passed
@generall generall deleted the fix-json-path-anonymization branch March 4, 2025 19:49
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2025
timvisee pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2025
* implement proper anonymization for json path

* fmt
@timvisee timvisee mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant