Skip to content

Conversation

belovachap
Copy link
Contributor

@belovachap belovachap commented Oct 21, 2017

👋 @peerchemist @hrobeers @backpacker69

This fella #198

I wrote a thing! Pulled back the changes to just remove text and option from the GUI options. Also ran the translation string extraction script and whatever lupdate is (some sort of QT tool?).

Can still send transactions on the testnet... so that's encouraging 🌈

@@ -448,7 +448,6 @@ static const CRPCCommand vRPCCommands[] =
{ "verifymessage", &verifymessage, false, false },
{ "getwork", &getwork, true, false },
{ "listaccounts", &listaccounts, false, false },
{ "settxfee", &settxfee, false, false },
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there's really no need to remove that rpc call, just remove it from gui part if you must.

Copy link
Member

@backpacker69 backpacker69 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if we must remove it, simply remove it from options dialog

@belovachap
Copy link
Contributor Author

will stick to just the gui options 👍

@belovachap belovachap changed the title [issue#198] A const TRANSACTION_FEE and no more options to change it :) [issue#198] No more GUI option for "additional transaction fee" :) Oct 22, 2017
@hrobeers
Copy link

@belovachap better rewrite history of this pull request.
now we have a commit removing lines and add them back by a later one.

So just do a git reset --soft <txid> and commit all in one commit and do a git push -f

This will also make it easier to cherry pick in later code rebases.

@belovachap belovachap force-pushed the issue#198_remove_additional_fee_option branch from 99ea18d to 890a070 Compare October 22, 2017 22:30
@hrobeers
Copy link

@backpacker69 @belovachap
This looks good to me.
Haven't done any testing yet, I leave that up to you guys since it doesn't touch the protocol.

@peerchemist peerchemist merged commit 49af99b into peercoin:develop Oct 23, 2017
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP("bitcoin-core", ""
"If the file does not exist, create it with owner-readable-only file "
"permissions.\n"
"It is also recommended to set alertnotify so you are notified of problems;\n"
"for example: alertnotify=echo %%s | mail -s \"Peercoin Alert\" admin@foo.com\n"),
"for example: alertnotify=echo %%s | mail -s \"Peercoin Alert\" admin@foo."
"com\n"),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this correct?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It possibly is an accidental return.
But it doesn't impact compilation, it's just syntactically different.
Good catch though, will revert this later.

hrobeers added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2017
Corrected some changes in pull #199
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants