[arcilator] Remove JIT Runtime Library #8483
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks, @fzi-hielscher! I'm expecting to see this now work: https://github.com/llvm/circt/actions/runs/15051167585/job/42306080185 💯 |
TaoBi22
pushed a commit
to TaoBi22/circt
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2025
This reverts commit 30ed753.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit 30ed753.
Remove the arcilator runtime library for JIT runs for now as the dynamically linked library gets in the way of static builds. Should fix #8430. I do not expect this change to affect any users.
The purpose of the library in its current form is to allow prints to
stderr(which is the default for FIRRTL prints) from the compiled hardware model. This cannot be done directly from LLVM IR in a way that is portable across libc implementations. But since there is currently no lowering path for FIRRTL prints, we don't need this at the moment.I'll open a tracking issue on getting this functionality back in later.