Skip to content

Conversation

Manik2708
Copy link
Contributor

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

How was this change tested?

  • Unit And Integration Tests

Checklist

…evel

Signed-off-by: Manik2708 <mehtamanik96@gmail.com>
@Manik2708 Manik2708 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 23, 2025 15:32
@Manik2708 Manik2708 requested a review from joe-elliott April 23, 2025 15:32
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.01%. Comparing base (e22fa5d) to head (1ce9a7a).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7067   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.01%   96.01%           
=======================================
  Files         355      355           
  Lines       20993    21000    +7     
=======================================
+ Hits        20156    20163    +7     
  Misses        630      630           
  Partials      207      207           
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 9.95% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
badger_v2 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v1-manual 14.98% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v2-auto 2.05% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v2-manual 2.05% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v1-manual 14.98% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v2-auto 2.05% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v2-manual 2.05% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 20.02% <68.33%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 20.10% <68.33%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 20.27% <68.33%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
grpc_v1 11.51% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
grpc_v2 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
kafka-3.x-v1 10.23% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
kafka-3.x-v2 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
memory_v2 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
opensearch-1.x-v1 20.15% <68.33%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
opensearch-2.x-v1 20.15% <68.33%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
opensearch-2.x-v2 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
query 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
tailsampling-processor 0.56% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 94.78% <98.33%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Signed-off-by: Manik2708 <mehtamanik96@gmail.com>
@Manik2708 Manik2708 requested a review from yurishkuro April 24, 2025 07:43
Signed-off-by: Manik2708 <mehtamanik96@gmail.com>
@Manik2708 Manik2708 requested a review from yurishkuro April 25, 2025 08:21
@yurishkuro yurishkuro added the changelog:exprimental Change to an experimental part of the code label Apr 27, 2025
@yurishkuro yurishkuro enabled auto-merge April 27, 2025 17:25
@yurishkuro yurishkuro added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 27, 2025
Merged via the queue into jaegertracing:main with commit c3f8f21 Apr 27, 2025
57 of 58 checks passed
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…der` level (jaegertracing#7067)

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Fixes a part of: jaegertracing#7034 

## Description of the changes
- Make `NestedTags` and `ElevatedTags` distinction at `CoreSpanReader`
level and a follow-up PR for jaegertracing#6946

## How was this change tested?
- Unit And Integration Tests

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: Manik2708 <mehtamanik96@gmail.com>
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…der` level (jaegertracing#7067)

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Fixes a part of: jaegertracing#7034

## Description of the changes
- Make `NestedTags` and `ElevatedTags` distinction at `CoreSpanReader`
level and a follow-up PR for jaegertracing#6946

## How was this change tested?
- Unit And Integration Tests

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: Manik2708 <mehtamanik96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: amol-verma-allen <amol.verma@allen.in>
@Manik2708 Manik2708 deleted the tag-reader branch May 6, 2025 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog:exprimental Change to an experimental part of the code storage/elasticsearch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants