Fix bounds_of_nested_lanes #8039
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bounds_of_nested_lanes assumed that one layer of nested vectorization could be removed at a time. When faced with the expression: min(ramp(x8(a), x8(b), 5), x40(27)) It panicked, because on the left hand side it reduced the bounds to x8(a) ... x8(a) + x8(b) * 4, and on the right hand side it reduced the bounds to 27. It then attempted to take a min of mismatched types. In general we can't assume that binary operators on nested vectors have the same nesting structure on both sides, so I just rewrote it to reduce directly to a scalar. Fixes #8038
vksnk
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2024
steven-johnson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2024
* Fix bounds_of_nested_lanes bounds_of_nested_lanes assumed that one layer of nested vectorization could be removed at a time. When faced with the expression: min(ramp(x8(a), x8(b), 5), x40(27)) It panicked, because on the left hand side it reduced the bounds to x8(a) ... x8(a) + x8(b) * 4, and on the right hand side it reduced the bounds to 27. It then attempted to take a min of mismatched types. In general we can't assume that binary operators on nested vectors have the same nesting structure on both sides, so I just rewrote it to reduce directly to a scalar. Fixes #8038
ardier
pushed a commit
to ardier/Halide-mutation
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2024
* Fix bounds_of_nested_lanes bounds_of_nested_lanes assumed that one layer of nested vectorization could be removed at a time. When faced with the expression: min(ramp(x8(a), x8(b), 5), x40(27)) It panicked, because on the left hand side it reduced the bounds to x8(a) ... x8(a) + x8(b) * 4, and on the right hand side it reduced the bounds to 27. It then attempted to take a min of mismatched types. In general we can't assume that binary operators on nested vectors have the same nesting structure on both sides, so I just rewrote it to reduce directly to a scalar. Fixes halide#8038
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bounds_of_nested_lanes assumed that one layer of nested vectorization could be removed at a time. When faced with the expression:
min(ramp(x8(a), x8(b), 5), x40(27))It panicked, because on the left hand side it reduced the bounds to
x8(a) ... x8(a) + x8(b) * 4, and on the right hand side it reduced the bounds to27. It then attempted to take a min of mismatched types.In general we can't assume that binary operators on nested vectors have the same nesting structure on both sides, so I just rewrote it to reduce directly to a scalar.
Fixes #8038