Skip to content

Conversation

gooohgb
Copy link
Contributor

@gooohgb gooohgb commented May 8, 2025

This PR fixes a bug where a reverse edge (@reverse predicate) with a count index (@count) may lose values when the same predicate is set and deleted multiple times within a single DQL mutation.

@gooohgb gooohgb requested a review from a team as a code owner May 8, 2025 09:48
Copy link
Contributor

@harshil-goel harshil-goel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for the fix

@mangalaman93 mangalaman93 merged commit b74a1ce into hypermodeinc:main May 10, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
harshil-goel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
…9403)

This PR fixes a bug where a reverse edge (`@reverse` predicate) with a
count index (`@count`) may lose values when the same predicate is set
and deleted multiple times within a single DQL mutation.

---------

Co-authored-by: Li <lix6@legal.regn.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants