Skip to content

Conversation

garyschulte
Copy link
Contributor

@garyschulte garyschulte commented Jun 4, 2025

PR description

implement an upper limit on the size of the rewardPercentile array besu will process for eth_feeHistory RPC requests.

In the absence of a size limit defined in spec, besu defers to what other clients are using for an upper limit:

Fixed Issue(s)

Thanks for sending a pull request! Have you done the following?

  • Checked out our contribution guidelines?
  • Considered documentation and added the doc-change-required label to this PR if updates are required.
  • Considered the changelog and included an update if required.
  • For database changes (e.g. KeyValueSegmentIdentifier) considered compatibility and performed forwards and backwards compatibility tests

Locally, you can run these tests to catch failures early:

  • spotless: ./gradlew spotlessApply
  • unit tests: ./gradlew build
  • acceptance tests: ./gradlew acceptanceTest
  • integration tests: ./gradlew integrationTest
  • reference tests: ./gradlew ethereum:referenceTests:referenceTests

Signed-off-by: garyschulte <garyschulte@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: garyschulte <garyschulte@gmail.com>
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#### Fusaka Devnet
- EIP-7825 - Transaction gas limit cap [#8700](https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/pull/8700)
- EIP-7823 - Modexp upper bounds [#8632](https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/pull/8632)
- implement rewardPercentile cap in eth_feeHistory [#8748](https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/pull/8748)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this fusaka specific?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@garyschulte garyschulte Jun 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is not. it is just a safety thing - whoops, I missed that you were implying it was in the wrong changelog block. We will have to fix this on subsequent PR :homer_bushes:

@garyschulte garyschulte merged commit e200e11 into hyperledger:main Jun 4, 2025
48 checks passed
Gabriel-Trintinalia added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2025
* EIP-7825: Transaction gas limit cap (#8700)

* EIP-7825: Transaction gas limit cap

Signed-off-by: Fabio Di Fabio <fabio.difabio@consensys.net>

* Support transaction gas limit cap when simulating a tx

Signed-off-by: Fabio Di Fabio <fabio.difabio@consensys.net>

* Do not allow isAllowExceedingGasLimit for when block simulation is strict

Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <gabriel.trintinalia@consensys.net>

---------

Signed-off-by: Fabio Di Fabio <fabio.difabio@consensys.net>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <gabriel.trintinalia@consensys.net>
Co-authored-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <gabriel.trintinalia@consensys.net>

* EIP-7823 - Modexp upper bounds (#8632)

Signed-off-by: Simon Dudley <simon.dudley@consensys.net>

* Change Maven artifactIds to avoid possible collisions with other libs (#8589)

* Improve Maven artifacts naming to avoid possible collisions with other libs

Signed-off-by: Fabio Di Fabio <fabio.difabio@consensys.net>

* Rename besu subproject to app (#8746)

* Rename `besu` module to `app`

Signed-off-by: Fabio Di Fabio <fabio.difabio@consensys.net>

* Implement percentiles array size limit for eth_feeHistory (#8748)

* implement percentiles array size limit for eth_feeHistory

Signed-off-by: garyschulte <garyschulte@gmail.com>

* Revert "feat: remove chain head check if peer supports eth/69 (#8725)" (#8753)

This reverts commit ed1086d.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <gabriel.trintinalia@consensys.net>

---------

Signed-off-by: Fabio Di Fabio <fabio.difabio@consensys.net>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <gabriel.trintinalia@consensys.net>
Signed-off-by: Simon Dudley <simon.dudley@consensys.net>
Signed-off-by: garyschulte <garyschulte@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabio Di Fabio <fabio.difabio@consensys.net>
Co-authored-by: Simon Dudley <simon.dudley@consensys.net>
Co-authored-by: garyschulte <garyschulte@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants