Skip to content

Conversation

dweiss
Copy link
Contributor

@dweiss dweiss commented Sep 12, 2024

Fixes #1153.

Copy link

google-cla bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@dweiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

dweiss commented Sep 12, 2024

I've just submitted the CLA.

copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
Fixes #1153.

Fixes #1161

FUTURE_COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=#1161 from dweiss:1153-block-line-comments-in-java23 e3ed83c
PiperOrigin-RevId: 674301748
copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
The intent was to only run the test on JDK 23+ and to disable it until the linked issue was fixed, but it actually resulted in the test being discovered and run on all JDK versions.

That's fine, because the test is backwards compatible (`///` comments are valid in all versions, they just aren't markdown comments until 23).

The test is being fixed in #1161

PiperOrigin-RevId: 674301162
copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
The intent was to only run the test on JDK 23+ and to disable it until the linked issue was fixed, but it actually resulted in the test being discovered and run on all JDK versions.

That's fine, because the test is backwards compatible (`///` comments are valid in all versions, they just aren't markdown comments until 23).

The test is being fixed in #1161

PiperOrigin-RevId: 674352956
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Different formatting of block line comments with openjdk 23+37-2369
2 participants