Skip to content

fix(multientities): Broken DB migration #3756

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2025

Conversation

ancorcruz
Copy link
Contributor

DB migration to create Customer Applied invoice custom sections breaks as it is unable to find customers that are soft deleted as we do not currently delete the join model InvoiceCustomSectionSelections records on customer soft deletion (we only do it on InvoiceCustomSection soft deletion).

DB migration to create Customer Applied invoice custom sections breaks
as it is unable to find customers that are soft deleted as we do not
currently delete the join model InvoiceCustomSectionSelections records
on customer soft deletion (we only do it on InvoiceCustomSection soft
deletion).
@ancorcruz ancorcruz self-assigned this May 29, 2025
@ancorcruz ancorcruz added 🐞 Bug Something isn't working multi_entities labels May 29, 2025
@ancorcruz ancorcruz marked this pull request as ready for review May 29, 2025 10:52
@ancorcruz ancorcruz merged commit 3c8a6a8 into main May 29, 2025
14 checks passed
@ancorcruz ancorcruz deleted the fix/multientities/broken_db_migration branch May 29, 2025 11:52
diegocharles pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2025
DB migration to create Customer Applied invoice custom sections breaks
as it is unable to find customers that are soft deleted as we do not
currently delete the join model InvoiceCustomSectionSelections records
on customer soft deletion (we only do it on InvoiceCustomSection soft
deletion).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐞 Bug Something isn't working multi_entities
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants