Skip to content

Upgrade to Gaphas 5 #3798

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

Upgrade to Gaphas 5 #3798

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2025

Conversation

amolenaar
Copy link
Member

@amolenaar amolenaar commented Mar 19, 2025

Builds on #3797

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bug fix
  • Feature
  • Chore (refactoring, formatting, local variables, other cleanup)
  • Documentation content changes

What is the current behavior?

We did not update to Gaphas 5 yet.

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

In Gaphas 5, GtkView.update() returns a task, that can be awaited. The custom decorators have been removed.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

@amolenaar amolenaar requested a review from danyeaw March 19, 2025 22:12
@github-actions github-actions bot added the python Pull requests that update Python code label Mar 19, 2025
In Gaphas 5, GtkView.update() returns a task, that can be awaited.
@amolenaar amolenaar changed the base branch from update-deps to main March 20, 2025 10:39
@amolenaar amolenaar merged commit f3d7bd1 into main Mar 20, 2025
7 checks passed
@amolenaar amolenaar deleted the gaphas-5 branch March 20, 2025 17:54
@amolenaar amolenaar added skip-changelog Do not add this entry to the changelog and removed skip-changelog Do not add this entry to the changelog labels Apr 16, 2025
@danyeaw danyeaw added chore Maintenance related PR and removed python Pull requests that update Python code labels May 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chore Maintenance related PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants