Skip to content

Conversation

mtrmac
Copy link
Collaborator

@mtrmac mtrmac commented Jul 24, 2025

This matches containers/skopeo#2661 , without it, any Skopeo test is going to fail, as in https://github.com/containers/image/pull/2905/checks?check_run_id=46601934935

@lsm5 PTAL.

This matches containers/skopeo#2661 ,
without it, any Skopeo test is going to fail, as in
https://github.com/containers/image/pull/2905/checks?check_run_id=46601934935

Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <mitr@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@lsm5 lsm5 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah good catch. LGTM

@lsm5
Copy link
Member

lsm5 commented Jul 24, 2025

Do we need 2 LGTMs on this one?

@mtrmac
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mtrmac commented Jul 24, 2025

Not in c/image , per https://github.com/containers/image/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md .

@lsm5 lsm5 merged commit c54cb9c into containers:main Jul 24, 2025
11 checks passed
@mtrmac mtrmac deleted the skopeo-ci-image branch July 24, 2025 14:38
TomSweeneyRedHat added a commit to TomSweeneyRedHat/skopeo that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
Do a quick vendor test of c/image with a proposed PR for cherry picking
into c/image v5.35.*.

Proposed PR: containers/image#2907

Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat <tsweeney@redhat.com>
TomSweeneyRedHat added a commit to TomSweeneyRedHat/skopeo that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
Do a quick vendor test of c/image with a proposed PR for cherry picking
into c/image v5.35.*.

Proposed PR: containers/image#2907

Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat <tsweeney@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants