-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37.7k
fuzz: Add missing fuzz targets to cmake build #30712
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. Code CoverageFor detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report. ReviewsSee the guideline for information on the review process.
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update. ConflictsReviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first. |
Looks correct. |
Such a check can be automated: https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin/commits/pr30712_amended. |
cmake/script/Coverage.cmake
Outdated
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ | |||
include(${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/CoverageInclude.cmake) | |||
|
|||
set(functional_test_runner test/functional/test_runner.py) | |||
list(APPEND functional_test_runner --timeout-factor=8) # Required, because coverage builds are slower |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've noticed the same -- hebasto#341 (comment):
However, on my machine, I had to add
--timeout-factor=4
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
dropped from this pull for now
0dbe55d
to
41a5479
Compare
6dc4fcd
to
501059b
Compare
🐙 This pull request conflicts with the target branch and needs rebase. |
501059b
to
fa0e1e4
Compare
Rebased. Should probably be merged before switching any fuzzing over to cmake. |
@hebasto I see your comments, but I am not sure if you approve this pull request, or if you want to open an alternative. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK fa0e1e4
Fixes #30454 (comment)
Can be tested via: