-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37.8k
test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s #20472
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
review ACK 05c1095 assuming tests pass |
Code review ACK 05c1095 |
jonatack
reviewed
Nov 24, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 05c1095
promag
reviewed
Nov 24, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review ACK 05c1095.
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2020
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2021
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2021
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2021
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2021
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2021
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2021
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2021
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2021
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2021
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2021
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
kwvg
pushed a commit
to kwvg/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2021
…es with leading +/-/0:s 05c1095 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on bitcoin#20457 and bitcoin#20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c1095 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c1095 jonatack: ACK 05c1095 promag: Code review ACK 05c1095. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
deadalnix
pushed a commit
to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2022
Summary: This is a backport of [[bitcoin/bitcoin#20472 | core#20472]] Test Plan: `ninja check` Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D11091
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add testing of
ParseInt
/ParseUInt
edge cases with leading+
/-
/0
:s.Context: While working on #20457 and #20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering.