Skip to content

Conversation

maflcko
Copy link
Member

@maflcko maflcko commented Nov 5, 2020

No description provided.

@Empact
Copy link
Contributor

Empact commented Nov 9, 2020

nit: would be nice to include the failure output, for reference

@maflcko
Copy link
Member Author

maflcko commented Nov 10, 2020

The blocks won't sync and the utxo can't be spent. The mempool rejects it with "prevout not found"

https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5827051938643968?command=functional_test#L823

@Empact
Copy link
Contributor

Empact commented Nov 10, 2020

Code Review ACK 4444128

@maflcko maflcko merged commit 42f950c into bitcoin:master Nov 10, 2020
@maflcko maflcko deleted the 2011-testInt branch November 10, 2020 08:23
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2020
…block

4444128 test: Fix intermittent issue in wallet_listsinceblock (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  Empact:
    Code Review ACK bitcoin@4444128

Tree-SHA512: 86d47b1e3c8681dd479654589c894016ac81a3c96a34c3b4a75278b2af85054ea8c6f768e518a5322a4928d82d5e99105bbce0f4fa6a7a18c40e3e0799f9ab54
deadalnix pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2021
Summary:
Generate a privkey in the test framework instead of using dumpprivkey so
that descriptor wallets work in this test.

This is a backport of [[bitcoin/bitcoin#18788 | core#18788]] [4/16] & [[bitcoin/bitcoin#20322 | core#20322]] (adds a `sync_all`)
bitcoin/bitcoin@c2711e4
bitcoin/bitcoin@4444128

I also had to add a `key_to_p2pkh_cashaddr` function to get the address in the correct format. This has the added benefit of adding coverage for `cashaddr.encode[_full]` which was unused before this commit, as far as I can tell.

Test Plan: `test/functional/test_runner.py wallet_listsinceblock`

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Subscribers: Fabien

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D10656
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 15, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants