Skip to content

Conversation

justindhillon
Copy link
Contributor

@justindhillon justindhillon commented Feb 25, 2024

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Feb 25, 2024

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage

For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers
ACK fjahr

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 At least one of the CI tasks failed. Make sure to run all tests locally, according to the
documentation.

Possibly this is due to a silent merge conflict (the changes in this pull request being
incompatible with the current code in the target branch). If so, make sure to rebase on the latest
commit of the target branch.

Leave a comment here, if you need help tracking down a confusing failure.

Debug: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/runs/21945394777

README.md Outdated
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Translations
------------

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to
[Bitcoin Core's Transifex page](https://www.transifex.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/).
[Bitcoin Core's Transifex page](https://explore.transifex.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/).
Copy link
Member

@hebasto hebasto Feb 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current link works fine for me. It redirects to https://app.transifex.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/dashboard/ or https://explore.transifex.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/ depending on the website cookies content.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It works for me as well, so not absolutely needed to update it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It works here as well.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If a translator has already logged into their Transifex account, the current link brings them directly to the project dashboard. But the suggested link brings to the project in "explore" mode, and logging in is required to start working on translations.

So I'm NACK about this change.

@hebasto
Copy link
Member

hebasto commented Feb 25, 2024

@justindhillon

The lint CI task fails because you modified the code in subtrees.

@fjahr
Copy link
Contributor

fjahr commented Feb 25, 2024

And could you squash these to one commit, please?

@justindhillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

The sub-trees are now unmodified, and everything is squashed into one commit. Thank you for all the help!

@fjahr
Copy link
Contributor

fjahr commented Feb 26, 2024

ACK c9bf07c

The transifex links are not broken for me, so I'm not sure if they need updating. Maybe some browsers have issues with the redirect so it's ok for me to keep the change though.

@fanquake fanquake changed the title Fix Broken Links doc: Fix Broken Links Feb 26, 2024
@DrahtBot DrahtBot added the Docs label Feb 26, 2024
@fanquake
Copy link
Member

Given the above discussion, I think the only change that can be made here is the one in netutil.py. So you can either reduce this PR to just that change, or close it.

@justindhillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Given the above discussion, I think the only change that can be made here is the one in netutil.py. So you can either reduce this PR to just that change, or close it.

Thanks for the feedback. The PR has been updated to only include netutil.pu.

@fjahr
Copy link
Contributor

fjahr commented Feb 27, 2024

ACK 6fa61e3

@fanquake fanquake merged commit ba907f9 into bitcoin:master Feb 27, 2024
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
6fa61e3 doc: Fix Broken Links (Justin Dhillon)

Pull request description:

  ### Summery

  Here is what I have fixed:

  http://voorloopnul.com/blog/a-python-netstat-in-less-than-100-lines-of-code/
   --> https://web.archive.org/web/20190424172231/http://voorloopnul.com/blog/a-python-netstat-in-less-than-100-lines-of-code/

  ### Support my work

  These links were found with [link-inspector](https://github.com/justindhillon/link-inspector). If you find this PR useful, give the repo a ⭐

ACKs for top commit:
  fjahr:
    ACK 6fa61e3

Tree-SHA512: ba83badfc8a89f33813801f749bcd7ad41d4c9c817ece76f3bb1b60f24c28e99cfccc485a0ba059ec2c1134e8ffb5fa37fdc9835e553229ee5b1167c9b2e8d1f
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
6fa61e3 doc: Fix Broken Links (Justin Dhillon)

Pull request description:

  ### Summery

  Here is what I have fixed:

  http://voorloopnul.com/blog/a-python-netstat-in-less-than-100-lines-of-code/
   --> https://web.archive.org/web/20190424172231/http://voorloopnul.com/blog/a-python-netstat-in-less-than-100-lines-of-code/

  ### Support my work

  These links were found with [link-inspector](https://github.com/justindhillon/link-inspector). If you find this PR useful, give the repo a ⭐

ACKs for top commit:
  fjahr:
    ACK 6fa61e3

Tree-SHA512: ba83badfc8a89f33813801f749bcd7ad41d4c9c817ece76f3bb1b60f24c28e99cfccc485a0ba059ec2c1134e8ffb5fa37fdc9835e553229ee5b1167c9b2e8d1f
PastaPastaPasta added a commit to dashpay/dash that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
b70e091 Merge bitcoin#29667: fuzz: actually test garbage >64b in p2p transport test (fanquake)
6d7aa3d Merge bitcoin#29497: test: simplify test_runner.py (fanquake)
d0e15d5 Merge bitcoin#29606: refactor: Reserve memory for ToLower/ToUpper conversions (Ava Chow)
045fa5f Merge bitcoin#29514: tests: Provide more helpful assert_equal errors (Ava Chow)
bd607f0 Merge bitcoin#29393: i2p: log connection was refused due to arbitrary port (Ava Chow)
c961755 Merge bitcoin#29595: doc: Wrap flags with code in developer-notes.md (fanquake)
8d6e5e7 Merge bitcoin#29583: fuzz: Apply fuzz env (suppressions, etc.) when fetching harness list (fanquake)
4dce690 Merge bitcoin#29576: Update functional test runner to return error code when no tests are found to run (fanquake)
910a7d6 Merge bitcoin#29529: fuzz: restrict fopencookie usage to Linux & FreeBSD (fanquake)
fdac2b3 Merge bitcoin#29493: subtree: update crc32c subtree (fanquake)
a23b342 Merge bitcoin#29475: doc: Fix Broken Links (fanquake)
92bad90 Merge bitcoin#28178: fuzz: Generate with random libFuzzer settings (fanquake)
9b6a05d Merge bitcoin#29443: depends: fix BDB compilation on OpenBSD (fanquake)
9963e6b Merge bitcoin#29413: fuzz: increase length of string used for `NetWhitelist{bind}Permissions::TryParse` (fanquake)
3914745 Merge bitcoin#29425: test: fix intermittent failure in wallet_reorgrestore.py (fanquake)
b719883 Merge bitcoin#29399: test: Fix utxo set hash serialisation signedness (fanquake)
f096880 Merge bitcoin#29377: test: Add makefile target for running unit tests (Ava Chow)
03e0bd3 Merge bitcoin#27319: addrman, refactor: improve stochastic test in `AddSingle` (Ava Chow)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Batch of trivial backports

  ## What was done?
  See commits

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  built locally; large combined merge passed tests locally

  ## Breaking Changes
  Should be none

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK b70e091
  knst:
    utACK b70e091

Tree-SHA512: 659a931f812c8a92cf3854abb873d92885219a392d6aa8e49ac4b27fe41e8e163ef9a135050e7c2e1bd33cecd2f7dae215e05a9c29f62e837e0057d3c16746d6
@bitcoin bitcoin locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 26, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants