Skip to content

Conversation

maflcko
Copy link
Member

@maflcko maflcko commented Dec 2, 2022

This allows to run the test even when no wallet is compiled in.

Also, it is a lot nicer to read now.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Dec 2, 2022

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers
ACK glozow
Concept ACK 0xB10C, theStack

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

Conflicts

No conflicts as of last run.

@maflcko maflcko changed the title test: Run mempool_packages.py with MiniWallet test: Run mempool_packages.py with MiniWallet Dec 2, 2022
@DrahtBot DrahtBot changed the title test: Run mempool_packages.py with MiniWallet test: Run mempool_packages.py with MiniWallet Dec 2, 2022
@DrahtBot DrahtBot added the Tests label Dec 2, 2022
@maflcko maflcko force-pushed the 2212-test-mini-wallet- branch from fa01ecf to fad0f2b Compare December 2, 2022 17:03
@0xB10C
Copy link
Contributor

0xB10C commented Dec 2, 2022

Concept ACK

@fanquake fanquake requested a review from glozow December 4, 2022 15:18
@maflcko maflcko force-pushed the 2212-test-mini-wallet- branch 3 times, most recently from faf5258 to fad2366 Compare December 6, 2022 10:47
@maflcko maflcko force-pushed the 2212-test-mini-wallet- branch from fad2366 to fae6c68 Compare December 6, 2022 11:28
@theStack
Copy link
Contributor

theStack commented Dec 6, 2022

Concept ACK

Copy link
Member

@glozow glozow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK fa834fa, looks correct to me. one nit

MarcoFalke added 5 commits January 17, 2023 10:30
This is not used right now, but may be in the future. Also, it
simplifies the create_self_transfer return logic
To make the code less verbose and easier to read.
@maflcko maflcko force-pushed the 2212-test-mini-wallet- branch from 4a972f6 to fa6b402 Compare January 17, 2023 09:42
@fanquake fanquake requested review from theStack and glozow January 17, 2023 15:38
@glozow
Copy link
Member

glozow commented Jan 17, 2023

reACK fa6b402

@fanquake fanquake merged commit 89fb354 into bitcoin:master Jan 17, 2023
@maflcko maflcko deleted the 2212-test-mini-wallet-🕎 branch January 17, 2023 17:44
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2023
fa6b402 test: Run mempool_packages.py with MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
fa448c2 test: Return fee from MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
faec09f test: Return chain of MiniWallet txs from MiniWallet chain method (MarcoFalke)
faa12d4 test: Refactor MiniWallet sign_tx (MarcoFalke)
fa2d821 test: Return wtxid from create_self_transfer_multi (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  This allows to run the test even when no wallet is compiled in.

  Also, it is a lot nicer to read now.

ACKs for top commit:
  glozow:
    reACK fa6b402

Tree-SHA512: de0338068fd51db01d64ce270f94fd2982a63a6de597325cd1e1f11127e9075bd4aeacace0ed76d09a2db8b962b27237cf11edb4c1fe1a01134d397f8a11bd05
@bitcoin bitcoin locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants