-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37.7k
test: Move wallet tests to wallet_*.py #26601
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The head ref may contain hidden characters: "2211-test-move-wallet-\u{1F357}"
Conversation
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ReviewsSee the guideline for information on the review process.
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update. ConflictsReviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first. |
Removed it from the list in #20078 (comment) |
It also checks that older nodes still sync with new ones, though not in very interesting ways. But splitting it might be overkill. Since the bulk of the code checks wallet compatibility, I don't mind renaming it. If we ever want to test more interesting (soft-fork / p2p) backwards compatibility we could also make a new test (which would ideally use MiniWallet). |
Pushed to move two wallet tests to |
fab57fa
to
faf00ed
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cr ACK.
I see @Sjors's point, I still agree with this change as I'm also following the upgrading of tests to MiniWallet usage and this change conveys that intention.
Since we are here, perhaps you could move |
Not sure, about half of it is testing the wallet, the other half not. Ideally the parts were split or the non-wallet parts wouldn't depend on a wallet, so I'll leave it for a follow-up for now. |
faf00ed
to
fa078f1
Compare
fa078f1
to
fa1800b
Compare
fa1800b
to
fa7d71a
Compare
rebased |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK fa7d71a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
re-ACK fa7d71a
The tests only tests the wallet and it doesn't make sense to extend it for other stuff, so clarify that.