Skip to content

Conversation

maflcko
Copy link
Member

@maflcko maflcko commented Mar 11, 2022

There are currently a few incorrect comments: Block 432 is mined "twice" (The second one is actually 433).

There isn't any need to mine this many blocks anyway, so remove a few calls.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Mar 17, 2022

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Conflicts

No conflicts as of last run.

@aureleoules
Copy link
Contributor

tACK fa41268 (test/functional/feature_segwit.py)
Tested on NixOS 22.05 64 bits.

Verified that the number of blocks mined is reduced and do not alter the tests.

Copy link
Contributor

@theStack theStack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested ACK fa8593f

@maflcko maflcko merged commit b8f498f into bitcoin:master Mar 22, 2022
@maflcko maflcko deleted the 2203-test_fix_seg-🏌 branch March 22, 2022 09:22
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2022
…_segwit

fa8593f test: Fix generate calls and comments in feature_segwit (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  There are currently a few incorrect comments: Block `432` is mined "twice" (The second one is actually 433).

  There isn't any need to mine this many blocks anyway, so remove a few calls.

ACKs for top commit:
  theStack:
    Tested ACK fa8593f

Tree-SHA512: b034077b85e6c978a80aa4de493797b4ae451d686cfb3e4fe40f37a38f41f7cb886f8e00a1c245a284be3502164b17414097fcb0bef66d155a1c1db5cfbe9e8f
@bitcoin bitcoin locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants