Skip to content

Conversation

jonatack
Copy link
Member

Clarify which networks are displayed by the peer counts table (reachable networks; follow-up to #23324) in response to questions received over the past months, and a few other improvements.

- clarify that the peer counts table is of reachable networks

- a few other clarifications
@brunoerg
Copy link
Contributor

Concept ACK

Copy link
Contributor

@w0xlt w0xlt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK a4da16f

" 1 - Like 0 but with a peers listing (without address or version columns)\n"
" 0 - Peer counts for each reachable network as well as for block relay peers\n"
" and manual peers, and the list of local addresses and ports\n"
" 1 - Like 0 but preceded by a peers listing (without address and version columns)\n"
" 2 - Like 1 but with an address column\n"
" 3 - Like 1 but with a version column\n"
" 4 - Like 1 but with both address and version columns\n"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh we kind of went out of hand with the number of combinations here.

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Feb 17, 2022

Code review ACK a4da16f

Copy link
Contributor

@kristapsk kristapsk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK a4da16f

@maflcko maflcko merged commit 66636ca into bitcoin:master Feb 18, 2022
@jonatack jonatack deleted the netinfo-doc-improvements branch February 18, 2022 08:46
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2022
@bitcoin bitcoin locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 18, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants