Skip to content

Conversation

sipa
Copy link
Member

@sipa sipa commented Jun 11, 2018

The existing SelfTest code does not cover the specialized double-SHA256-for-64-byte-inputs transforms added in #13191. Fix this.

@theuni
Copy link
Member

theuni commented Jun 11, 2018

utACK 5edb0bc0e52a7be44ec22257e21ec9198f86acbb, assuming the tests actually pass. Thanks!

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Jun 12, 2018

slightly tested ACK 5edb0bc0e52a7be44ec22257e21ec9198f86acbb, code looks good, does not seem to add noticable startup time.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

Needs rebase

@sipa sipa force-pushed the 201806_selftestsha branch from 5edb0bc to 1e1eb63 Compare June 12, 2018 19:10
@sipa
Copy link
Member Author

sipa commented Jun 12, 2018

Rebased.

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Jun 18, 2018

re-utACK 1e1eb63

@laanwj laanwj merged commit 1e1eb63 into bitcoin:master Jun 18, 2018
laanwj added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2018
1e1eb63 Improve coverage of SHA256 SelfTest code (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  The existing SelfTest code does not cover the specialized double-SHA256-for-64-byte-inputs transforms added in #13191. Fix this.

Tree-SHA512: 593c7ee5dc9e77fc4c89e0a7753a63529b0d3d32ddbc015ae3895b52be77bee8a80bf16b754b30a22c01625a68db83fb77fa945a543143542bebb5b0f017ec5b
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2019
1e1eb63 Improve coverage of SHA256 SelfTest code (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  The existing SelfTest code does not cover the specialized double-SHA256-for-64-byte-inputs transforms added in bitcoin#13191. Fix this.

Tree-SHA512: 593c7ee5dc9e77fc4c89e0a7753a63529b0d3d32ddbc015ae3895b52be77bee8a80bf16b754b30a22c01625a68db83fb77fa945a543143542bebb5b0f017ec5b
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2019
1e1eb63 Improve coverage of SHA256 SelfTest code (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  The existing SelfTest code does not cover the specialized double-SHA256-for-64-byte-inputs transforms added in bitcoin#13191. Fix this.

Tree-SHA512: 593c7ee5dc9e77fc4c89e0a7753a63529b0d3d32ddbc015ae3895b52be77bee8a80bf16b754b30a22c01625a68db83fb77fa945a543143542bebb5b0f017ec5b
barrystyle pushed a commit to PACGlobalOfficial/PAC that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2020
1e1eb63 Improve coverage of SHA256 SelfTest code (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  The existing SelfTest code does not cover the specialized double-SHA256-for-64-byte-inputs transforms added in bitcoin#13191. Fix this.

Tree-SHA512: 593c7ee5dc9e77fc4c89e0a7753a63529b0d3d32ddbc015ae3895b52be77bee8a80bf16b754b30a22c01625a68db83fb77fa945a543143542bebb5b0f017ec5b
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants