Skip to content

Conversation

maflcko
Copy link
Member

@maflcko maflcko commented Mar 7, 2020

Presumably an oversight in #17926 (comment)

@practicalswift
Copy link
Contributor

Tested ACK fab0e5b

Thanks for adding this assertion! The more assertions the merrier.

@maflcko maflcko merged commit be00ef2 into bitcoin:master Mar 9, 2020
@maflcko maflcko deleted the 2003-fuzzScriptAssertEqual branch March 9, 2020 15:20
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2020
fab0e5b fuzz: Add assert(script == decompressed_script) (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Presumably an oversight in bitcoin#17926 (comment)

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    Tested ACK fab0e5b

Tree-SHA512: 6dcec06169df497a540fd6ebbcd89f5db22257241b2bbe756de868742f9bc324b80d38dbababfa07e5f3a830aaae9fc6d168dcc2ca5d75da437bdf4dc4e0f370
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin-core/syscoin that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2020
fab0e5b fuzz: Add assert(script == decompressed_script) (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Presumably an oversight in bitcoin#17926 (comment)

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    Tested ACK fab0e5b

Tree-SHA512: 6dcec06169df497a540fd6ebbcd89f5db22257241b2bbe756de868742f9bc324b80d38dbababfa07e5f3a830aaae9fc6d168dcc2ca5d75da437bdf4dc4e0f370
Fabcien pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2021
Summary: Backport of core [[bitcoin/bitcoin#18292 | PR18292]].

Test Plan:
  ninja bitcoin-fuzzers
  ./test/fuzz/test_runner.py <path_to_corpus>

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, PiRK

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, PiRK

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D8945
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 15, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants