Skip to content

Conversation

icota
Copy link
Contributor

@icota icota commented Nov 4, 2019

Per @Sjors comments in #16110 (review)

@fanquake fanquake added the Docs label Nov 4, 2019
@cvengler
Copy link
Contributor

cvengler commented Nov 5, 2019

Wouldn't it be better to create a file for this in the doc folder and link to it in the README?

@icota
Copy link
Contributor Author

icota commented Nov 5, 2019

I don't think so. This is specific to depends and other platform cross-compilation instructions are in the same file.

@Sjors
Copy link
Member

Sjors commented Nov 5, 2019

It's fine. It's not that long yet, and if you search the repo for Android you'll find it :-)

ACK 3fe1aba

maflcko pushed a commit to maflcko/bitcoin-core that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2019
…argets and API levels

3fe1aba depends: move README.md Android instructions to a separate section (Igor Cota)
aa9b84a depends: update README.md with working Android targets and API levels (Igor Cota)

Pull request description:

  Per @Sjors comments in bitcoin#16110 (review)

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    ACK 3fe1aba

Tree-SHA512: 7a2e676070d51c7a4291b0d4b638f52321c08cc6ebe2bd2c02ba62f6cc3dd8a73227df4693c6ce9201863eb0bf26e0133805347b9016cb0f9a389a49cc9492aa
@maflcko maflcko merged commit 3fe1aba into bitcoin:master Nov 5, 2019
@cryptozeny
Copy link

thanks alot!

@icota icota deleted the update-android-depends-doc branch November 5, 2019 14:54
@Sjors
Copy link
Member

Sjors commented Nov 5, 2019

Future note: please don't tag Github usernames in commit messages; it results in spam when altcoins backport it. My own fault for missing that :-)

@icota
Copy link
Contributor Author

icota commented Nov 6, 2019

You didn't miss anything. 😄

I read CONTRIBUTING like a good boy so I didn't include it in any commit messages. Merge commit picked it up from the first comment though. Should we avoid that?

@Sjors
Copy link
Member

Sjors commented Nov 6, 2019

No, I think the merge script should take care of that. I thought it stripped the @. @MarcoFalke?

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Nov 6, 2019

No, it doesn't strip them—as this might corrupt, say, mail addresses, github's parsing is pretty ambigious and heuristic-based and replicating this is non-trivial!
it warns when there are any before merging, though

@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 16, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants