doc: Bip70 removal follow-up #17285
Merged
doc: Bip70 removal follow-up #17285
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I was hesitant about this at first, but tend to agree nothing is lost by simply calling it "chain name". They are part of the RPC API (not only internal identifier) so this doesn't mean it can be changed willy-nilly from now on, though. |
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ConflictsReviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first. |
|
Concept ACK |
|
ACK b413bdf |
maflcko
reviewed
Oct 30, 2019
|
ACK 3ed8e3d |
laanwj
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2019
3ed8e3d doc: Remove explicit network name references (Fabian Jahr) d6e493f wallet: Remove left-over BIP70 comment (Fabian Jahr) Pull request description: A small follow-up to #17165 which removed BIP70 support. 1. Removes one leftover mention of BIP70 in a comment. 2. Removes BIP70 reference in comments on network/chain name strings. These can be removed as they are not really helpful and also incorrect: BIP70 only defines "main" and "test" but not "regtest". If/When signet gets merged we will add another name to the list that is not defined in BIP70. Mostly there is also an exhaustive list of the options included in the comment anyway. If we would like to keep an identifier for this naming scheme, I would suggest switching to something more generic, like 'short chain name'. Happy to implement that if that is preferred. Alternatively, we could add a reference to `CBaseChainParams`. That would also mean we don't have to change these lines again for signet. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 3ed8e3d Tree-SHA512: 9a7c0b9cacbb67bd31a089ffdc6f1ebc7f336493e2c8266eb697da34dce2b505a431d5639a3e4fc34f9287361343e861b55dc2662e0a1d2095cc1046db77d6ee
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2019
3ed8e3d doc: Remove explicit network name references (Fabian Jahr) d6e493f wallet: Remove left-over BIP70 comment (Fabian Jahr) Pull request description: A small follow-up to bitcoin#17165 which removed BIP70 support. 1. Removes one leftover mention of BIP70 in a comment. 2. Removes BIP70 reference in comments on network/chain name strings. These can be removed as they are not really helpful and also incorrect: BIP70 only defines "main" and "test" but not "regtest". If/When signet gets merged we will add another name to the list that is not defined in BIP70. Mostly there is also an exhaustive list of the options included in the comment anyway. If we would like to keep an identifier for this naming scheme, I would suggest switching to something more generic, like 'short chain name'. Happy to implement that if that is preferred. Alternatively, we could add a reference to `CBaseChainParams`. That would also mean we don't have to change these lines again for signet. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 3ed8e3d Tree-SHA512: 9a7c0b9cacbb67bd31a089ffdc6f1ebc7f336493e2c8266eb697da34dce2b505a431d5639a3e4fc34f9287361343e861b55dc2662e0a1d2095cc1046db77d6ee
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin-core/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2020
3ed8e3d doc: Remove explicit network name references (Fabian Jahr) d6e493f wallet: Remove left-over BIP70 comment (Fabian Jahr) Pull request description: A small follow-up to bitcoin#17165 which removed BIP70 support. 1. Removes one leftover mention of BIP70 in a comment. 2. Removes BIP70 reference in comments on network/chain name strings. These can be removed as they are not really helpful and also incorrect: BIP70 only defines "main" and "test" but not "regtest". If/When signet gets merged we will add another name to the list that is not defined in BIP70. Mostly there is also an exhaustive list of the options included in the comment anyway. If we would like to keep an identifier for this naming scheme, I would suggest switching to something more generic, like 'short chain name'. Happy to implement that if that is preferred. Alternatively, we could add a reference to `CBaseChainParams`. That would also mean we don't have to change these lines again for signet. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 3ed8e3d Tree-SHA512: 9a7c0b9cacbb67bd31a089ffdc6f1ebc7f336493e2c8266eb697da34dce2b505a431d5639a3e4fc34f9287361343e861b55dc2662e0a1d2095cc1046db77d6ee
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A small follow-up to #17165 which removed BIP70 support.
If we would like to keep an identifier for this naming scheme, I would suggest switching to something more generic, like 'short chain name'. Happy to implement that if that is preferred. Alternatively, we could add a reference to
CBaseChainParams. That would also mean we don't have to change these lines again for signet.