Skip to content

Conversation

kristapsk
Copy link
Contributor

Similar check for spellcheck already exists in lint-shell.sh

Similar check for spellcheck already exists in lint-shell.sh
@fanquake fanquake added the Tests label Aug 30, 2019
@practicalswift
Copy link
Contributor

ACK 8340763 -- diff looks correct

Copy link
Member

@fanquake fanquake left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 8340763 - Test is the same as in lint-shell.sh.

git rev-parse HEAD
8340763dc3278c828ee7d525de4c71b4615d17cc
michaels-MacBook-Pro-2:bitcoin michael$ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh 
ci/retry/retry:20: Paramters  ==> Parameters
contrib/guix/manifest.scm:109: Convienience  ==> Convenience
src/netbase.cpp:608: thru  ==> through
src/netbase.cpp:712: sepcified  ==> specified
src/node/transaction.cpp:34: doesnt  ==> doesn't, does not
src/node/transaction.cpp:34: doesnt'  ==> doesn't
src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo  ==> of, for
src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo  ==> of, for
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt
michaels-MacBook-Pro-2:bitcoin michael$ pip uninstall codespell
Uninstalling codespell-1.15.0:
  Would remove:
    /Users/michael/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/bin/codespell
    /Users/michael/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/site-packages/codespell-1.15.0-py3.5.egg-info
    /Users/michael/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/site-packages/codespell_lib/*
Proceed (y/n)? y
  Successfully uninstalled codespell-1.15.0
michaels-MacBook-Pro-2:bitcoin michael$ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh 
Skipping spell check linting since codespell is not installed.

fanquake added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2019
8340763 Check for codespell in lint-spelling.sh (Kristaps Kaupe)

Pull request description:

  Similar check for `spellcheck` already exists in `lint-shell.sh`

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK 8340763 -- diff looks correct
  fanquake:
    ACK 8340763  - Test is the same as in `lint-shell.sh`.

Tree-SHA512: f590fc4eae391c5246e86cb70cf79431bd3763ac872f82d3b2222c3a095235ca046a7072c5e61bbaeb3ed6ecd5ff85979769ee8b585de4fb97ac8cfbbf73b956
@fanquake fanquake merged commit 8340763 into bitcoin:master Aug 31, 2019
@kristapsk kristapsk deleted the check-for-codespell branch August 31, 2019 13:20
linuxsh2 pushed a commit to linuxsh2/dash that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2021
8340763 Check for codespell in lint-spelling.sh (Kristaps Kaupe)

Pull request description:

  Similar check for `spellcheck` already exists in `lint-shell.sh`

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK 8340763 -- diff looks correct
  fanquake:
    ACK 8340763  - Test is the same as in `lint-shell.sh`.

Tree-SHA512: f590fc4eae391c5246e86cb70cf79431bd3763ac872f82d3b2222c3a095235ca046a7072c5e61bbaeb3ed6ecd5ff85979769ee8b585de4fb97ac8cfbbf73b956
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 16, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants