Skip to content

Conversation

ken2812221
Copy link
Contributor

@ken2812221 ken2812221 commented Feb 1, 2019

The bitcoin-wallet.exe would have to link with libsecp256k1 after we build libsecp256k1 in project.

@maflcko maflcko added this to the 0.18.0 milestone Feb 1, 2019
@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Feb 1, 2019

cc @sipsorcery

@maflcko maflcko added the Windows label Feb 1, 2019
@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Feb 3, 2019

tool_wallet seems to pass already: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/22082489#L129

@NicolasDorier
Copy link
Contributor

tACK

@ken2812221
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MarcoFalke I think that MSVC is trying to link with vcpkg's secp256k1 library that is in the cache.

error if we clear the cache: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ken2812221/bitcoin/builds/22067759

@sipsorcery
Copy link
Contributor

tACK bef8fdd.

maflcko pushed a commit to maflcko/bitcoin-core that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2019
…13926 and bitcoin#14372

bef8fdd msvc: Fix silent merge conflict between bitcoin#13926 and bitcoin#14372 (ken2812221)

Pull request description:

  The bitcoin-wallet.exe would have to link with libsecp256k1 after we build libsecp256k1 in project.

Tree-SHA512: cb3fafa301f39121f5d26ac8ac6009c9665fcad1061dbf14ba013104870abe5413ac57c97c97df12b6ba2ad709b776c51aeec20d41f3ae01d3460a5e18f40eec
@maflcko maflcko merged commit bef8fdd into bitcoin:master Feb 4, 2019
@ken2812221 ken2812221 deleted the msvc-merge-conflict branch February 4, 2019 16:34
maflcko pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2019
… part II

3c6ef03 msvc: Fix silent merge conflict between #13926 and #14372 part II (Chun Kuan Lee)

Pull request description:

  In #15325, I added secp256k1 as a dependency of bitcoin-wallet. However, I didn't notice that leveldb is also a dependency of it.

Tree-SHA512: dc29b5cad6c529dd9517d6c2cbbe5297b69e73303e2fbbcd4b4842c9c5b51a4332df5a4bf3b82cd3ed2c1668cc95f8c9636f9485af0d722fed9c1319da3cc2e2
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 16, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants