Skip to content

Conversation

meeseeksmachine
Copy link

Backport PR #17827: MNT: bump ubuntu image (22.04 -> 24.04) and uraimo/run-on-arch-action (v2.8.1 -> v3.0.0) on exotic archs

…) and `uraimo/run-on-arch-action` (`v2.8.1` -> `v3.0.0`) on exotic archs
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Astropy! 🌌 This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainers who will review this pull request of some common things to look for.

  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals?
  • Do the proposed changes follow the Astropy coding guidelines?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy testing guidelines?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy documentation guidelines?
  • Is rebase and/or squash necessary? If so, please provide the author with appropriate instructions. Also see instructions for rebase and squash.
  • Did the CI pass? If no, are the failures related? If you need to run daily and weekly cron jobs as part of the PR, please apply the "Extra CI" label. Codestyle issues can be fixed by the bot.
  • Is a change log needed? If yes, did the change log check pass? If no, add the "no-changelog-entry-needed" label. If this is a manual backport, use the "skip-changelog-checks" label unless special changelog handling is necessary.
  • Is this a big PR that makes a "What's new?" entry worthwhile and if so, is (1) a "what's new" entry included in this PR and (2) the "whatsnew-needed" label applied?
  • At the time of adding the milestone, if the milestone set requires a backport to release branch(es), apply the appropriate "backport-X.Y.x" label(s) before merge.

@pllim
Copy link
Member

pllim commented Feb 28, 2025

Huh, why is CircleCI freaking out? It is unrelated though.

@pllim pllim merged commit 087931c into astropy:v7.0.x Mar 1, 2025
33 of 36 checks passed
@neutrinoceros
Copy link
Contributor

Is this the only PR that hit that error ?

(for later reference: No follower's GitHub token could fetch config.yml)

@pllim
Copy link
Member

pllim commented Mar 2, 2025

Seems that way. Must be a fluke.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants