[IOTDB-6302] Enhance the support of ISO_LOCAL_DATE_TIME timestamp format #12086
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
JackieTien97
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2024
HTHou
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2024
SzyWilliam
pushed a commit
to SzyWilliam/iotdb
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2024
5 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
IoTDB doesn't support timestamp format like
2024-02-22T16:36:34.67, which should be equivalent to2024-02-22T16:36:34.670.After referred the code of JDK below, we can simply support it.